ArticleZoonoses and public health2020
Perception of health risks in Lao market vendors.
Article in Zoonoses and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Public and health professional epidemic risk perceptions in countries that are highly vulnerable to epidemics: a systematic review.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2022Pooled it
- Avian influenza and coronaviruses in live animal and wet markets in Laos: prevalence and public health considerations.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Economic methods and spatial scales in One Health: Results from a scoping review.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- The ethical considerations of primordial pandemic prevention from a one health perspective.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2025Article
- Consumer knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour regarding food safety - A perspective from Laos.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Human-animal entanglements in bushmeat trading in Sierra Leone: An ethnographic assessment of a potential zoonotic interface.PloS one · 2024Article
- Longitudinal comparison of bacterial pathogen seropositivity among wet market vendors in the Lao People's Democratic Republic.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- A strategy to assess spillover risk of bat SARS-related coronaviruses in Southeast Asia.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Virome characterization of game animals in China reveals a spectrum of emerging pathogens.Cell · 2022Article
- Bushmeat, wet markets, and the risks of pandemics: Exploring the nexus through systematic review of scientific disclosures.Environmental science & policy · 2021Review
- Low seroprevalence of COVID-19 in Lao PDR, late 2020.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2021Article
- Review
- Perception of health risks in Lao market vendors.Zoonoses and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Wet markets are a critical part of South-East Asian culture and economy. However, their role in circulation and transmission of both endemic and emerging disease is a source of concern in a region considered a hotspot of disease emergence. In the Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR, Laos), live and dead wild animals are frequently found in wet markets, despite legislation against the bushmeat trade. This is generally considered to increase the risk of disease transmission and emergence, although whether or not wildlife vendors themselves have indeed increased incidence of zoonotic disease has rarely been assessed. In preparation for a future longitudinal study of market vendors investigating vendors' exposure to zoonotic pathogens, we conducted a pilot survey of Lao market vendors of wildlife meat, livestock meat and vegetables, to identify demographic characteristics and potential control groups within markets. We also investigated baseline risk perception for infectious diseases among market vendors and assessed the association between risk perception and risk mitigation behaviours. The surveys conducted with 177 vendors revealed similar age, sex, ethnic background and geographical origin between vendor types, but differences in professional background and work history for livestock meat vendors. The perception of disease risk was very low across all vendors, as was the reported use of personal protective equipment, and the two appeared unrelated. Personal risk discounting and assumptions about transmission routes may explain this lack of association. This information will help inform the development of future research, risk communication and risk mitigation policy, especially in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.