ArticleInternational journal of laboratory hematology2021
Interest of the cellular population data analysis as an aid in the early diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Article in International journal of laboratory hematology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence Applications for COVID-19 in Intensive Care and Emergency Settings: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Monitoring for early prediction of gram-negative bacteremia using machine learning and hematological data in the emergency department.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Integrating Cell Population Data With Hematology Analyzer Messages for Improved Detection of Immature White Blood Cells and Laboratory Efficiency.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025Article
- Can Haematological Parameters Discriminate COVID-19 from Influenza?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- A machine learning tool for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection from hemogram parameters.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2023Article
- Leukocyte cell population data as potential markers of COVID-19 disease characterization.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2023Article
- Prognostic value of cellular population data in patients with COVID-19.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2023Article
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Monocyte Distribution Width in Sepsis.Journal of inflammation research · 2022Review
- Diagnostic and prognostic utility of WBC counts and cell population data in patients with COVID-19.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2021Article
- Interest of the cellular population data analysis as an aid in the early diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by a high contagiousness requiring isolation measures. At this time, diagnosis is based on the positivity of specific RT-PCR and/or chest computed tomography scan, which are time-consuming and may delay diagnosis. Complete blood count (CBC) can potentially contribute to the diagnosis of COVID-19. We studied whether the analysis of cellular population data (CPD), provided as part of CBC-Diff analysis by the DxH 800 analyzers (Beckman Coulter), can help to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection.
methodsCellular population data of the different leukocyte subpopulations were analyzed in 137 controls, 322 patients with proven COVID-19 (COVID+), and 285 patients for whom investigations were negative for SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-). When CPD of COVID+ were different from controls and COVID- patients, we used receiver operating characteristic analysis to test the discriminating capacity of the individual parameters. Using a random forest classifier, we developed the algorithm based on the combination of 4 monocyte CPD to discriminate COVID+ from COVID- patients. This algorithm was tested prospectively in a series of 222 patients referred to the emergency unit.
resultsAmong the 222 patients, 86 were diagnosed as COVID-19 and 60.5% were correctly identified using the discriminating protocol. Among the 136 COVID- patients, 10.3% were misclassified (specificity 89.7%, sensitivity 60.5%). False negatives were observed mainly in patients with a low inflammatory state whereas false positives were mainly seen in patients with sepsis.
conclusionConsideration of CPD could constitute a first step and potentially aid in the early diagnosis of COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.