ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2020
Multidisciplinary aortopathy clinics: A systematic scoping review of the literature and evaluation of patient experiences from a newly started clinic in Norway.
Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endovascular Treatment for Aortic Diseases: Intercontinental Disparities.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Hereditary Thoracic Aortic Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Ascending Aortic Aneurysms <4.5 cm for Nonsyndromic Adults: Very Slow Growth and Low Risk.Aorta (Stamford, Conn.) · 2023Article
- Multidisciplinary aortopathy clinics: A systematic scoping review of the literature and evaluation of patient experiences from a newly started clinic in Norway.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInternational guidelines recommend hereditary thoracic aortic diseases (HTADs) to be managed in multidisciplinary aorta clinics.
aimTo study HTAD patient's experiences with a aortopathy clinic in Norway and to review the literature on aortopathy clinics.
methods(a) A systematic scoping review of research on multidisciplinary clinics for HTADs. (b) A cross-sectional postal questionnaire study to investigate patient experiences with the health-services. Fifty consecutive patients from the aortopathy clinic and 50 controls in usual care were invited to participate.
resultsThe review identified eight publications on aortopathy clinics. Although the papers were not judged for quality, these showed promising results from such clinics in terms of diagnostics and increased adherence to guideline-directed therapy. The survey constituted thirty-seven (74%) patients and 22 (44%) controls who responded to postal questionnaires. Both groups reported delays in diagnostics and follow-up appointments prior to the start of the clinic. Patients indicated high satisfaction with the aortopathy clinic, whereas controls reported poor coordination of medical follow-up. Individuals in both groups struggled with disease self-management.
conclusionNorwegian patient experiences found the aortopathy clinic beneficial. According to studies included in the review, disease management in aortopathy clinics may improve patient satisfaction, diagnostics and follow-up. Effect studies may further document the benefits of clinic organization, treatment, cost-efficiency and patient experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.