Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32812243›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of dermatology2020

Final analysis of a phase II study of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab for unresectable chemotherapy-naive advanced melanoma.

Kenjiro Namikawa, Yoshio Kiyohara, Tatsuya Takenouchi, Hisashi Uhara, Hiroshi Uchi, Shusuke Yoshikawa, Sumiko Takatsuka, Hiroshi Koga, Naoko Wada, Hironobu Minami and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Optimal strategy in managing advanced melanoma.The Journal of dermatology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kenjiro NamikawaDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2763-7346
Yoshio KiyoharaDermatology Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Tatsuya TakenouchiDepartment of Dermatology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Hisashi UharaDepartment of Dermatology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Hiroshi UchiDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shusuke YoshikawaDermatology Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Sumiko TakatsukaDepartment of Dermatology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Hiroshi KogaDepartment of Dermatology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0704-8037
Naoko WadaDepartment of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hironobu MinamiDepartment of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Masahiro HatsumichiOno Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Yoshinobu NambaOno Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
Naoya YamazakiDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9638-0428
Kyushu University · JPNiigata Cancer Center Hospital · JPOno Pharmaceutical (Japan) · JPShinshu University · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JPKobe University · JP

Funding

Bristol Myers Squibb N/AOno Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination is currently one of the preferred regimens for advanced melanoma in recently updated clinical practice guidelines. However, the evidence on the efficacy of the combination for acral or mucosal subtypes remains less robust. This is the final analysis of a multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled phase II study that investigated the long-term efficacy and safety in treatment-naive Japanese patients with advanced melanoma, including acral or mucosal subtypes, and subsequent therapy after discontinuation of the investigational agents. Patients received four doses of nivolumab (1 mg/kg i.v.) in combination with ipilimumab (3 mg/kg i.v.) at 3-week intervals, followed by doses of nivolumab (3 mg/kg i.v.) at 2-week intervals. The median follow-up period was 20.8 months (range, 5.2-35.0). The centrally and locally assessed objective response rates were both 43.3% (13/30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 25.5-62.6). Median progression-free survival was not reached (95% CI, 3.02-not reached), and median overall survival was also not reached (95% CI, 19.52-not reached). The 30-month progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 50.3% and 54.2%, respectively. No new safety concerns were detected. After discontinuation of the investigational agents, 83.3% of patients received some form of subsequent therapy including 43.3% of patients who received nivolumab monotherapy and 26.7% of patients who received radiotherapy. Of the four patients who discontinued the investigational agents because of immune-related adverse events, two received subsequent therapy (nivolumab and ipilimumab, respectively) and the other two showed long-term treatment-free survival (659 and 590 days, respectively). Long-term survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was observed in Japanese patients with melanoma including acral and mucosal subtypes, which is consistent with the CheckMate 067 study. Many patients continued to receive some form of treatment safely after stopping treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

Indexed as

MelanomaNivolumabAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansIpilimumabProgression-Free SurvivalIpilimumabNivolumabipilimumabJapanmelanomamucosalnivolumab

Identifiers

PMID32812243
PMCPMC7693067
OpenAlexW3080392435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.