ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021
Detection of systemic immunosuppressants in autologous serum eye drops (ASED) in patients with severe chronic ocular graft versus host disease.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum Eye Drops: Implementation, Upscaling, and Patient-Centered Care - Insights from a Blood Bank in Western Austria.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026Review
- Corneal Amiodarone Deposition and Its Implications for Autologous Serum Eye Drop Therapy: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Real-World Outcomes of Allogeneic Immunosafe Plasma Rich in Growth Factors Eye Drops for Refractory Ocular Surface Diseases: A Prospective Observational Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Article
- [Chinese expert consensus on ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease (2023)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2023Article
- Challenges and concepts in the diagnosis and management of ocular graft-versus-host disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Recent advances in ocular graft-versus-host disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Cascade of Inflammatory, Fibrotic Processes, and Stress-Induced Senescence in Chronic GVHD-Related Dry Eye Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Ocular graft-versus-host disease (oGVHD): From A to Z.Survey of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeChronic graft versus host disease is a major consequence after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) and has great impact on patients' morbidity and mortality. Besides the skin, liver, and intestines, the eyes are most commonly affected, manifesting as severe ocular surface disease. Treatment protocols include topical steroids, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and ASED. Since these patients often receive systemic immunosuppressant therapy from their oncologists, a topical re-administration of these drugs via ASED with potentially beneficial or harmful effects is possible. The purpose of the study was to determine whether and to which extent systemic immunosuppressants are detectable in ASED.
methodsA total of 34 samples of ASED from 16 patients with hemato-oncological malignancies after allo-SCT were collected during the manufacturing process and screened for levels of cyclosporine, mycophenolic acid, everolimus, and tacrolimus via liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and informed consent was obtained from the subjects after explanation of the nature and possible consequences of the study.
resultsCyclosporine was found in 18 ASED samples in concentrations ranging from 6.5-105.0 ng/ml (32.0 ± 22.8 ng/ml, mean ± SD). The concentration range of mycophenolic acid in 19 samples was 0.04-25.0 mg/l (4.0 ± 5.4 mg/l, mean ± SD). Everolimus and tacrolimus concentrations were well below the respective limits of quantification (< 0.6 and < 0.5 ng/ml) of the established LC-MS/MS method in all samples.
conclusionsOur study suggests that orally administered cyclosporine and mycophenolic acid for the treatment of systemic GvHD, but not everolimus and tacrolimus, are distinctly detectable in ASED in relevant concentrations. It is highly likely that these agents affect topical therapy of ocular GvHD. However, the extent of this effect needs to be evaluated in further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.