Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32812128›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2021

Navigational guidelines and positional relationships of the human auditory ossicles from three-dimensional topography for ensuring safe and effective malleostapedotomy : Stereotactic topography of the auditory ossicles and its clinical implication.

Kang-Jae Shin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kang-Jae ShinDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Dong-A University College of Medicine, 32, Daesingongwon-ro, Seo-gu, Busan, 49201, Republic of Korea. shinkj@dau.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8703-9220
Dong-A University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) 2018R1C1B5045507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aims of the present study were to identify detailed positional relationship between the auditory ossicles and to provide theoretic navigational guidelines for optimal prosthesis adaptation and effective malleostapedotomy.

methodsFifty sides of the temporal bone from donated cadavers were scanned by MicroCT and the malleus, incus, stapes and tympanic membrane were materialized three dimensionally using computer software. Dimensions between the auditory ossicles closely related to malleostapedotomy were measured twice.

resultsThe grip site of malleus handle was mean 1.8 mm superior and mean 1.3 mm anterior, and linear distance between the grip site of malleus handle and the footplate of the stapes was mean 6.5 mm. The stapes was not parallel to the tympanic membrane and rotated mean 10.7° posteriorly relative to the tympanic membrane.

conclusionSurgeons should start with at least 8.75 mm prosthesis to cover the upper limits of potential anatomy and then trim down to the individualization to the case. The ideal loop morphology has to be oval shape more than 1.4 mm in the long diameter and 1.0 mm in the short diameter. The wire of the prosthesis has to be bended at the two points: about 10° anteriorly at the most proximal point of the wire and about 50° superiorly at the stapes head point.

Indexed as

AgedCadaverFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalIntraoperative ComplicationsMaleMalleusOssicular ProsthesisProsthesis ImplantationStapesStapes SurgeryStereotaxic TechniquesTemporal BoneX-Ray MicrotomographyAnatomyAuditory ossiclesMicroCTProsthesisStapedotomy

Identifiers

PMID32812128
OpenAlexW3080771296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.