Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32812124›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2021

Optimizing Differentiated HIV Treatment Models in Urban Zimbabwe: Assessing Patient Preferences Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Michael Strauss, Gavin George, Joanne E Mantell, Munyaradzi Mapingure, Tsitsi B Masvawure, Matthew R Lamb, Jennifer M Zech, Godfrey Musuka, Innocent Chingombe, Martin Msukwa and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michael StraussHealth Economics and HIV/AIDS Research Division (HEARD), University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa. watsupmike@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7849-8812
Gavin GeorgeHealth Economics and HIV/AIDS Research Division (HEARD), University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Joanne E MantellDepartment of Psychiatry, Division of Gender, Sexuality and Health, The New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0748-5974
Munyaradzi MapingureICAP at Columbia University, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Tsitsi B MasvawureHealth Studies Program, Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA, USA.
Matthew R LambICAP at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Jennifer M ZechICAP at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Godfrey MusukaICAP at Columbia University, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Innocent ChingombeICAP at Columbia University, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Martin MsukwaICAP at Columbia University, Pretoria, South Africa.
Rodrigo BoccaneraHealth Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Rockville, MD, USA.
Clorata GwanzuraHIV/AIDS and STIs Unit, Ministry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Tsitsi ApolloHIV/AIDS and STIs Unit, Ministry of Health and Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Miriam RabkinICAP at Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

The Statistics, Data Science, and Data Management (SDM) CoreP30MH043520 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI Claude Ann Mellins · 2003 to 2026
$48.2M
HRSA HHS UJ7HA31180NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH043520NIMH NIH HHS P30-MH43520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differentiated service delivery holds great promise for streamlining the delivery of health services for HIV. This study used a discrete choice experiment to assess preferences for differentiated HIV treatment delivery model characteristics among 500 virally suppressed adults on antiretroviral therapy in Harare, Zimbabwe. Treatment model characteristics included location, consultation type, healthcare worker cadre, operation times, visit frequency and duration, and cost. A mixed effects logit model was used for parameter estimates to identify potential preference heterogeneity among participants, and interaction effects were estimated for sex and age as potential sources of divergence in preferences. Results indicated that participants preferred health facility-based services, less frequent visits, individual consultations, shorter waiting times, lower cost and, delivered by respectful and understanding healthcare workers. Some preference heterogeneity was found, particularly for location of service delivery and group vs. individual models; however, this was not fully explained by sex and age characteristics of participants. In urban areas, facility-based models, such as the Fast Track model requiring less frequent clinic visits, are likely to better align with patient preferences than some of the other community-based or group models that have been implemented. As Zimbabwe scales up differentiated treatment models for stable patients, a clear understanding of patient preferences can help in designing services that will ensure optimal utilization and improve the efficiency of service delivery.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAdultAmbulatory CareChoice BehaviorHIV InfectionsHumansZimbabweDifferentiated service deliveryDiscrete choice experimentHIV treatmentUrbanZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID32812124
PMCPMC7846512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.