Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32812096›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2021

Voluntarily reported prescribing, monitoring and medication transfer errors in intensive care units in The Netherlands.

B E Bosma, N G M Hunfeld, E Roobol-Meuwese, T Dijkstra, S M Coenradie, A Blenke, W Bult, P H G J Melief, M Perenboom-Van Dixhoorn, P M L A van den Bemt

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

B E BosmaDepartment of Pharmacy, Haga Teaching Hospital, Els Borst-Eilersplein 275, 2545 CH, The Hague, The Netherlands. l.bosma@hagaziekenhuis.nl.
N G M HunfeldDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
E Roobol-MeuweseDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA, The Hague, The Netherlands.
T DijkstraDepartment of Pharmacy, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Vlietlandplein 2, 3118 JH, Schiedam, The Netherlands.
S M CoenradieReinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Reinier de Graafweg 5, 2625 AD, Delft, The Netherlands.
A BlenkeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, PO Box 3406, 5203 DK, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
W BultDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
P H G J MeliefDepartment of Critical Care, Haga Teaching Hospital, Els Borst-Eilersplein 275, 2545 CH, The Hague, The Netherlands.
M Perenboom-Van DixhoornDepartment of Critical Care, Haga Teaching Hospital, Els Borst-Eilersplein 275, 2545 CH, The Hague, The Netherlands.
P M L A van den BemtDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Haga Hospital · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLErasmus MC · NLFranciscus Vlietland · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLReinier de Graaf Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Medication errors occur frequently in intensive care units (ICU). Voluntarily reported medication errors form an easily available source of information. Objective This study aimed to characterize prescribing, monitoring and medication transfer errors that were voluntarily reported in the ICU, in order to reveal medication safety issues. Setting This retrospective data analysis study included reports of medication errors from eleven Dutch ICU's from January 2016 to December 2017. Method We used data extractions from the incident reporting systems of the participating ICU's. The reports were transferred into one database and categorized into type of error, cause, medication (groups), and patient harm. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the proportion of medication errors and the distribution of subcategories. Based on the analysis, ICU medication safety issues were revealed. Main outcome measure The main outcome measure was the proportion of prescribing, monitoring and medication transfer error reports. Results Prescribing errors were reported most frequently (n = 233, 33%), followed by medication transfer errors (n = 85, 12%) and monitoring errors (n = 27, 4%). Other findings were: medication transfer errors frequently caused serious harm, especially the omission of home medication involving the central nervous system and proton pump inhibitors; omissions and dosing errors occurred most frequently; protocol problems caused a quarter of the medication errors; and medications needing blood level monitoring (e.g. tacrolimus, vancomycin, heparin and insulin) were frequently involved. Conclusion This analysis of voluntarily reported prescribing, monitoring and medication transfer errors warrants several improvement measures in these processes, which may help to increase medication safety in the ICU.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsMedication ErrorsHumansNetherlandsRetrospective StudiesRisk ManagementIncident reporting systemIntensive care unitMedication errorMedication safetyPatient safetyThe NetherlandsVoluntarily reports

Identifiers

PMID32812096
OpenAlexW3061551449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.