Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32812064›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2020

Invasion category-oriented lymph node metastases of cholangiocarcinoma and the prognostic impact.

Shogo Kobayashi, Hiroshi Wada, Akira Tomokuni, Hidenori Takahashi, Kunihito Gotoh, Masato Sakon, Masaki Mori, Yuichiro Doki, Hidetoshi Eguchi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shogo KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 (E2) Yamadaoka, Suita city, Osaka, 537-8511, Japan. s-kobayashi@umin.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8828-1067
Hiroshi WadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Akira TomokuniDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Hidenori TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Kunihito GotohDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 (E2) Yamadaoka, Suita city, Osaka, 537-8511, Japan.
Masato SakonDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Masaki MoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 (E2) Yamadaoka, Suita city, Osaka, 537-8511, Japan.
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 (E2) Yamadaoka, Suita city, Osaka, 537-8511, Japan.
Hidetoshi EguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 (E2) Yamadaoka, Suita city, Osaka, 537-8511, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 15K10202Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18K08703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIt was speculated that intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) invasion would influence cancer progression, such as lymph node (LN) metastasis, and the efficacy of LN dissection (LND). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the LN metastatic pattern of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, including the invasion category and prognosis after surgical resection, in order to explore effective LND.

methodsWe analyzed a prospectively collected cohort for ICC with a previously reported invasion category: hilar type, showing invasion to the main or first branch of Glisson; peripheral type, showing no invasion to less than the third branch; and intermediate type, for all others.

resultsData from a total of 180 patients who underwent surgical resection were analyzed (LN dissection in 142 (79%)). In single ICC, hilar type had a higher LN metastatic rate than the others (hilar; 23/45 (51%), intermediate; 7/25 (28%), peripheral; 1/34 (3%)). Although the survival with LN metastasis (LN+) was worse, single and hilar/intermediate ICC LN+ had a better survival than peripheral type LN+ (3-year OS: hilar/intermediate 30-37%, peripheral 0%). The most frequent LN metastatic region was the hepatico-duodenal ligament for all invasion categories, and the LN metastatic region was not related to the survival. In peripheral ICC, LND did not affect the survival. By contrast, hilar/intermediate ICC LN+ had a better survival than did peripheral ICC LN+, and the 3-year OS was ≥ 20%.

conclusionLN metastasis depended on the ICC invasion category in addition to the tumor number, which affected patients' survival and the need for LND. In hilar-type disease, LN dissection may contribute to the survival.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaLymphatic MetastasisHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisRetrospective StudiesIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaInvasion categoryLymph node metastasisSurgical outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.