Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32812000›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2020

Understanding genomics and the immune environment of penile cancer to improve therapy.

Ahmet Murat Aydin, Jad Chahoud, Jacob J Adashek, Mounsif Azizi, Anthony Magliocco, Jeffrey S Ross, Andrea Necchi, Philippe E Spiess

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Penile cancer: Updates in systemic therapy.Asian journal of urology · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Immune-based therapies in penile cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmet Murat AydinDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6047-8431
Jad ChahoudDepartment of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jacob J AdashekDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4272-312X
Mounsif AziziDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Anthony MaglioccoDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Jeffrey S RossFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Andrea NecchiDepartment of Urology and Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Philippe E SpiessDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. philippe.spiess@moffitt.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5723-1972
Moffitt Cancer Center · USFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITSUNY Upstate Medical University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) has increased in developed countries over the past decades owing to increased human papilloma virus (HPV) exposure. Despite successful surgical treatment of locoregional PSCC, effective treatment options for advanced disease are limited. The prognosis of patients with bulky nodal and metastatic PSCC is dismal and new management approaches are urgently needed. Genomic analyses have provided transformative knowledge on the genomic and molecular landscape and tumour microenvironment of PSCC. Around one-quarter of patients with metastatic PSCC have clinically actionable genomic alterations in mechanistic target of rapamycin, DNA repair and receptor tyrosine kinase pathways. These patients might benefit from combined and sequential targeted therapies. HPV vaccination might be another therapeutic option as PSCC is genetically similar to other HPV-driven cancers. In addition, 40-60% of PSCC tumours show strong PDL1 expression, and the frequency of mutational signatures suggestive of immunotherapy resistance is low, pointing to potential utility of immunotherapy for PSCC. Finally, identification of the composition of the penile microbiota and its biological role might lead to new cancer prevention and treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenomicsHumansImmunotherapyMalePenile NeoplasmsTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID32812000
OpenAlexW3056276068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.