Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32811886›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A comparative metabolomic study on desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes under rainfed and irrigated field conditions.

Zaib Un Nisa, Anjuman Arif, Muhammad Qandeel Waheed, Tariq Mahmood Shah, Ayesha Iqbal, Amna Jabbar Siddiqui, Muhammad Iqbal Choudhary, Hesham R El-Seedi, Syed Ghulam Musharraf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
22.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Comprehensive Review on Chickpea (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Zaib Un NisaH.E.J. Research Institute of Chemistry, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi, 75270, Pakistan.
Anjuman ArifNuclear Institute for Agriculture & Biology (NIAB), Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Muhammad Qandeel WaheedNuclear Institute for Agriculture & Biology (NIAB), Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Tariq Mahmood ShahNuclear Institute for Agriculture & Biology (NIAB), Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Ayesha IqbalDr. Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and Drug Research, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi, 75270, Pakistan.
Amna Jabbar SiddiquiDr. Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and Drug Research, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi, 75270, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7602-9729
Muhammad Iqbal ChoudharyH.E.J. Research Institute of Chemistry, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi, 75270, Pakistan.
Hesham R El-SeediPharmacognosoy Group, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Biomedical Centre, Uppsala University, Box 574, 75 123, Uppsala, Sweden. hesham.el-seedi@ilk.uu.se.
Syed Ghulam MusharrafH.E.J. Research Institute of Chemistry, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi, 75270, Pakistan. musharraf1977@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2026-3302
University of Karachi · PKNuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology · PKJiangsu University · CNKing Abdulaziz University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chickpea is considered among the most important leguminous crops in the world. However, in recent years drought conditions and/or limited availability of water have significantly reduced the production of chickpea. The current study was aimed to understand the legume stress response at the metabolic level for the determination of chickpea genotypes which can resist yield losses and could be cultivated with limited water availability. Here, we have analyzed two genotypes of chickpea, desi and kabuli under rainfed condition using a GC-MS based untargeted metabolomics approach. Results revealed significant differences in several metabolite features including oxalic acid, threonic acid, inositol, maltose and L-proline between studied groups. Accumulation of plant osmoprotectants such as L-proline, sugars and sugar alcohols was higher in desi genotype than kabuli genotype of chickpea when grown under the rainfed condition. Metabolic pathway analysis suggests that the inositol phosphate metabolism was involved in plant defense mechanisms against the limited water availability.

Indexed as

AgricultureCicerCrops, AgriculturalFabaceaeGenotypeMetabolomicsPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID32811886
PMCPMC7434909
OpenAlexW3062183839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.