Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32811715›Full record

Trial reportEuropean urology2020

Final Analysis of the Ipilimumab Versus Placebo Following Radiotherapy Phase III Trial in Postdocetaxel Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Identifies an Excess of Long-term Survivors.

Karim Fizazi, Charles G Drake, Tomasz M Beer, Eugene D Kwon, Howard I Scher, Winald R Gerritsen, Alberto Bossi, Alfons J M van den Eertwegh, Michael Krainer, Nadine Houede and 16 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 20 institutions in 10 countries.

Karim FizaziGustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: karim.fizazi@gustaveroussy.fr.
Charles G DrakeColumbia University Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Tomasz M BeerOregon Health & Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA.
Eugene D KwonMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Howard I ScherMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Winald R GerritsenRadboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Alberto BossiInstitut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Alfons J M van den EertweghVU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael KrainerVienna General Hospital (AKH Wien), Wien, Austria.
Nadine HouedeCHU of Nimes, Nimes, France; Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.
Ricardo SantosCentro Médico Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Hakim MahammediCentre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Siobhan NgSt John Of God Hospital, Subiaco, Australia.
Riccardo DanielliUniversity Hospital of Siena, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Siena, Italy.
Fabio A FrankeHospital de Caridade de Ijuí, Ijuí, Brazil.
Santhanam SundarNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Neeraj AgarwalHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
André M BergmanThe Netherlands Cancer Institute and Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tudor E CiuleanuInstitute of Oncology Ion Chiricuta, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ernesto KorbenfeldHospital Britanico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Lisa SengeløvHerlev Hospital, Region Hovedstadens Apotek, Herlev, Denmark.
Steinbjorn HansenOdense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
M Brent McHenryBristol-Myers Squibb Company, Wallingford, CT, USA.
Allen ChenBristol-Myers Squibb Company, Wallingford, CT, USA.
Christopher LogothetisThe University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
CA184-043, Investigators
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLCentre Jean Perrin · FRColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USHerlev Hospital · DKHospital Británico de Buenos Aires · ARInstitute of Oncology Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta · ROInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBOdense University Hospital · DKOregon Health & Science University · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSt John of God Subiaco Hospital · AUThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FRUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe phase 3 trial CA184-043 evaluated radiotherapy to bone metastases followed by Ipilimumab or placebo in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had received docetaxel previously. In a prior analysis, the trial's primary endpoint (overall survival [OS]) was not improved significantly.

objectiveTo report the final analysis of OS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA total of 799 patients were randomized to receive a single dose of radiotherapy to one or more bone metastases followed by either Ipilimumab (n = 399) or placebo (n = 400). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: OS was analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. Prespecified and exploratory subset analyses based on Kaplan-Meier/Cox methodology were performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: During an additional follow-up of approximately 2.4 yr since the primary analysis, 721/799 patients have died. Survival analysis showed crossing of the curves at 7-8 mo, followed by persistent separation of the curves beyond that point, favoring the ipilimumab arm. Given the lack of proportional hazards, a piecewise hazard model showed that the hazard ratio (HR) changed over time: the HR was 1.49 (95% confidence interval 1.12, 1.99) for 0-5 mo, 0.66 (0.51, 0.86) for 5-12 mo, and 0.66 (0.52, 0.84) beyond 12 mo. OS rates were higher in the ipilimumab versus placebo arms at 2 yr (25.2% vs 16.6%), 3 yr (15.3% vs 7.9%), 4 yr (10.1% vs 3.3%), and 5 yr (7.9% vs. 2.7%). Disease progression was the most frequent cause of death in both arms. In seven patients (1.8%) in the ipilimumab arm and one (0.3%) in the placebo arm, the primary cause of death was reported as study drug toxicity. No long-term safety signals were identified.

conclusionsIn this preplanned long-term analysis, OS favored ipilimumab plus radiotherapy versus placebo plus radiotherapy for patients with postdocetaxel mCRPC. OS rates at 3, 4, and 5 yr were approximately two to three times higher in the ipilimumab arm. PATIENT SUMMARY: After longer follow-up, survival favored the group of men who received ipilimumab, with overall survival rates being two to three times higher at 3 yr and beyond.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBone NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDocetaxelDouble-Blind MethodHumansIpilimumabMaleMiddle AgedProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantSurvival RateTime FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalDocetaxelIpilimumabImmunotherapyIpilimumabProstate cancerRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32811715
PMCPMC8428575
OpenAlexW3049720236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.