ArticleBMC cancer2020
Survival predictors of metastatic angiosarcomas: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program population-based retrospective study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodality imaging features of primary mammary angiosarcoma: a case report with delayed osseous metastases.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Anlotinib-temozolomide combination achieves durable response in multimodal-resistant primary breast angiosarcoma with skull base metastasis and dural involvement: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Angiosarcoma in a soft tissue sarcoma cohort: real-world patterns and outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Case Report: A case series on actionable genomic alterations guiding effective targeted therapy in rare sarcomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical analysis of the impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on the prognosis of patients with early-stage ovarian cancer (stage IA-IIA): a propensity score matching study.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Article
- Low overall survival after treatment for angiosarcoma: a single-centre retrospective observational cohort study of 64 patients.BMC cancer · 2025Observational
- Article
- Imaging features of pediatric angiosarcomas: clinical, pathologic, and radiological review.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
- Primary Epithelioid Angiosarcoma of the Submandibular Gland-A Case Report with Histology-Cytology Correlation and Comprehensive Molecular Analysis.Head and neck pathology · 2024Article
- Treatment Outcomes for Primary Hepatic Angiosarcoma: National Cancer Database Analysis 2004-2014.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAngiosarcomas (AS) have poor prognosis and often metastasize to distant sites. The potential predictors of metastatic angiosarcomas (MAS) have not been extensively investigated. The main objective of this study was to identify survival predictors of MAS.
methodsSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) datasets were used to identify patients with MAS from 2010 to 2016. Risk predictors were determined with the aid of Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression model analyses.
resultsA total of 284 MAS patients met the study entry criteria. Among these, 121 patients (42.6%) were diagnosed with metastasis in bone, 26 in brain (9.2%), 86 in liver (30.3%) and 171 in lung (60.2%). Overall, 96 patients (33.8%) had two or more metastatic sites. The 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 20.8 and 3.8% while 1- and 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 22.0 and 5.2%, respectively. Cox regression analysis revealed chemotherapy, radiation treatment (RT) and tumor size ≤10 cm as independent favorable predictors of OS. In terms of CSS, tumor grade IV, tumor size > 10 cm and absence of chemotherapy were independent adverse predictors. Surgery did not prolong survival outcomes (both OS and CSS) in the current cohort.
conclusionMAS is associated with extremely poor survival. Chemotherapy, RT, and tumor size are independent predictors of OS. Chemotherapy and tumor size are independent prognostic factors of CSS. Chemotherapy is therefore recommended as the preferred treatment option for MAS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.