Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32811459›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

The longitudinal NIHR ARC North West Coast Household Health Survey: exploring health inequalities in disadvantaged communities.

Clarissa Giebel, Jason C McIntyre, Ana Alfirevic, Rhiannon Corcoran, Konstantinos Daras, Jennifer Downing, Mark Gabbay, Munir Pirmohamed, Jennie Popay, Paula Wheeler and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Clarissa GiebelDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building B Block, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK. Clarissa.giebel@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0746-0566
Jason C McIntyreSchool of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Ana AlfirevicNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK.
Rhiannon CorcoranDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building B Block, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
Konstantinos DarasNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK.
Jennifer DowningNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK.
Mark GabbayDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building B Block, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.
Munir PirmohamedNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK.
Jennie PopayNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK.
Paula WheelerNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK.
Keith HoltNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK.
Timothy WilsonNIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, UK.
Richard BentallDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ben BarrDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building B Block, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR130258National Institute for Health Research NIHR ARC NWC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Household Health Survey (HHS) was developed to understand the socioeconomic determinants of mental and physical health, and health inequalities in health and social care. This paper aims to provide a detailed rationale of the development and implementation of the survey and explore socio-economic variations in physical and mental health and health care.

methodsThis comprehensive longitudinal public health survey was designed and piloted in a disadvantaged area of England, comprising questions on housing, physical health, mental health, lifestyle, social issues, environment, work, and finances. After piloting, the HHS was implemented across 28 neighbourhoods - 10 disadvantaged neighbourhoods for learning (NfLs), 10 disadvantaged comparator sites, and eight relatively advantaged areas, in 2015 and 2018. Participants were recruited via random sampling of households in pre-selected neighbourhoods based on their areas of deprivation.

results7731 residents participated in Wave 1 (N = 4319) and 2 (n = 3412) of the survey, with 871 residents having participated in both. Mental health, physical health, employment, and housing quality were poorer in disadvantaged neighbourhoods than in relatively advantaged areas.

conclusionsThis survey provides important insights into socio-economic variations in physical and mental health, with findings having implications for improved care provision to enable residents from any geographical or socio-economic background to access suitable care.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesAdolescentAdultAgedEnglandFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedResidence CharacteristicsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultCo-productionDeprivationHealth care utilisationHealth inequalitiesHousingMental health

Identifiers

PMID32811459
PMCPMC7436975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.