SynthesisJournal of occupational health2020
Prevalence of musculoskeletal pain among professional drivers: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of occupational health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Musculoskeletal disorders among bank workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Musculoskeletal disorders among truck drivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2024Pooled it
- Musculoskeletal disorders among taxi drivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Pooled it
- COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among health care workers in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Musculoskeletal pain and sedentary behaviour in occupational and non-occupational settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021Pooled it
- Prevalence of musculoskeletal pain among professional drivers: A systematic review.Journal of occupational health · 2020Pooled it
- Sedentary behavior and activity patterns in Swedish log truck drivers - a descriptive cross-sectional study.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Assessing the Link Between Physical Activity and Musculoskeletal Disorders in Taxi Drivers: A Comparison of Accelerometry and Self-Report Measures.Musculoskeletal care · 2026Observational
- Perceived traffic and road-surface exposures are associated with recent musculoskeletal complaints among motorcycle couriers.Journal of occupational health · 2026Article
- Association between dynamic changes in lumbar back temperature during professional driver training and lumbar muscle endurance: a longitudinal study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Low Back Pain in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 124 Studies.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Whole-body vibration exposure and chronic low back pain among heavy machine operators and long-haul truck drivers in Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Time course of perceived knee stiffness following prolonged sitting in healthy adults.JSAMS plus · 2025Article
- The volume of occupational physical activity, lower back pain and workload among route salespeople in the beverage vending machine industry: a pilot study.Physical activity and nutrition · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of Impaired Fasting Glucose on Musculoskeletal Pain Among Female-Dominated Healthcare Workers.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychosocial risks in bus drivers: insights from a municipal company case study in Portugal.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Heavy Vehicle Drivers and Office Workers: A Comparative Analysis Using a Machine Learning Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Exploring the impact of occupational factors on low back pain in ride-sharing motorbike drivers in Bangladesh: A comprehensive cross-sectional analysis.Preventive medicine reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesProfessional drivers are at high risk of developing musculoskeletal pain (MSP) due to risk factors such as prolonged sitting, whole body vibration, awkward posture, and repetitive actions. This review investigates the reported prevalence of MSP among professional drivers.
methodsAn electronic search of Medline (1946 + via OvidSP), Embase (1974 + OvidSP), CINAHL (1982+), AMED, PubMed, and Web of Science from 1990 to July 2019 was performed. Methodological quality of studies was assessed using three quality assessment tools for cross-sectional, case-control, and prospective cohort studies. The prevalence of MSP was reported using descriptive analysis.
resultsA total of 56 studies conducted in 23 different countries across a total of 14 types of occupational transport were reviewed. Data of a total pooled population of 18 882 professional drivers were analyzed for MSP. The prevalence of MSP ranged between 43.1% and 93%. The low back was the most frequently reported body region for MSP with a meta-prevalence rate of 53% (N = 9998). Neck, shoulder, and upper back were the other common regions with high prevalence.
conclusionThere is a high prevalence of MSP in professional drivers and low back was the most frequently reported body region, followed by neck, upper back, shoulder, knee, hip/thigh, wrist, ankle, and elbow. MSP is complicated in nature and therefore in-depth exploration of causal relationships between MSP and risk factors is necessary so that appropriate healthcare programs can be initiated to prevent and treat MSP effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.