Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32810611›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology. Glaucoma

Special Commentary: Using Clinical Decision Support Systems to Bring Predictive Models to the Glaucoma Clinic.

Brian C Stagg, Joshua D Stein, Felipe A Medeiros, Barbara Wirostko, Alan Crandall, M Elizabeth Hartnett, Mollie Cummins, Alan Morris, Rachel Hess, Kensaku Kawamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology. Glaucoma. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brian C StaggJohn Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. Electronic address: brian.stagg@hsc.utah.edu.
Joshua D SteinCenter for Eye Policy & Innovation, Kellogg Eye Center, Department of Opthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Felipe A MedeirosDuke Eye Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Barbara WirostkoJohn Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Alan CrandallJohn Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
M Elizabeth HartnettJohn Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Mollie CumminsCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Alan MorrisDivision of Respiratory, Critical Care and Occupational Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Rachel HessDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Kensaku KawamotoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Funding

Personalized Forecasting of Disease Trajectory for Patients with Open Angle GlaucomaR01EY026641 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LAVIERI-WILLIAMS, MARIEL SOFIA, STEIN, JOSHUA D · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
The BCI (Brain Computer Interface) Glaucoma Study: Objective Home-Based Detection of Progressive Visual Function Loss in GlaucomaR01EY029885 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MEDEIROS, FELIPE · 2019 to 2022
$2.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026641NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in the field of predictive modeling using artificial intelligence and machine learning have the potential to improve clinical care and outcomes, but only if the results of these models are presented appropriately to clinicians at the time they make decisions for individual patients. Clinical decision support (CDS) systems could be used to accomplish this. Modern CDS systems are computer-based tools designed to improve clinician decision making for individual patients. However, not all CDS systems are effective. Four principles that have been shown in other medical fields to be important for successful CDS system implementation are (1) integration into clinician workflow, (2) user-centered interface design, (3) evaluation of CDS systems and rules, and (4) standards-based development so the tools can be deployed across health systems.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalGlaucomaArtificial IntelligenceHumansMachine Learningartificial intelligenceclinical decision supportglaucomamachine learningpredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID32810611
PMCPMC7854795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.