ArticleBlood advances2020
Prognostic impact of the ELN2017 risk classification in patients with AML receiving allogeneic transplantation.
Article in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Addition of ruxolitinib and decitabine to modified busulfan/cyclophosphamide conditioning regimen for prophylaxis relapse in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: the phase 2 prospective study.Annals of hematology · 2024Trial
- Review
- Artificial intelligence-based prognostic models in acute myeloid leukemia: systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood neoplasia · 2026Article
- Risk stratification of low-dose cytarabine and venetoclax in patients with AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.Blood advances · 2026Article
- A molecular-based risk score for predicting leukemia-free survival in adult AML patients undergoing Allo-HSCT.iScience · 2025Article
- Pretransplantation risk factors for positive MRD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in AML patients: a prospective study.Bone marrow transplantation · 2025Article
- Targeting SLFN11-regulated pathways restores chemotherapy sensitivity in AML.Blood neoplasia · 2024Article
- Myelodysplasia-related gene mutations are associated with favorable prognosis in patients with TP53-mutant acute myeloid leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a promising 5-gene prognostic model for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.Molecular biomedicine · 2024Article
- Survival after allogeneic transplantation according to pretransplant minimal residual disease and conditioning intensity in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Innovations in conditioning and post-transplant maintenance in AML: genomically informed revelations on the graft-versus-leukemia effect.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Allogeneic transplantation in acute myelogenous leukemia: a comprehensive single institution's experience.Haematologica · 2023Article
- A novel risk model for predicting early relapse in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2023Article
- Article
- Factors influencing access to specialised haematology units during acute myeloblastic leukaemia patient care: A population-based study in France.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Prognostic Value of Measurable Residual Disease in Patients with AML Undergoing HSCT: A Multicenter Study.Cancers · 2023Article
- Clinical Implications of theCancers · 2023Article
- Impact of IDH1 and IDH2 mutation detection at diagnosis and in remission in patients with AML receiving allogeneic transplantation.Blood advances · 2023Article
- Article
- HighCancers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2017, an updated European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk classification was published allocating patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to 3 risk groups on the basis of certain cytogenetic and molecular aberrations. To date, studies of the prognostic significance of the ELN2017 risk classification in the context of an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are lacking. We performed risk stratification according to the ELN2017 classification in 234 patients with AML who underwent allogeneic HSCT as a consolidation therapy. In our cohort, the risk of 39.7% of the patients was classified as favorable, that of 12.8% as intermediate, and that of 47.4% as adverse. In the context of allogeneic HSCT, the assignment to the 3 ELN2017 risk groups retained its prognostic significance, with patients with favorable risk having the best prognosis and those with adverse risk having the worst one. Subgroup analyses showed that patients with a monosomal karyotype or TP53 mutation had considerably increased relapse rates, even in the adverse-risk group. When we analyzed the impact of digital droplet PCR-based measurable residual disease (MRD) before allogeneic HSCT, MRD+ patients had impaired prognoses, with cumulative incidence of relapse and overall survival comparable to those of patients classified as having an ELN2017 adverse genetic risk. This study is the first to demonstrate that the ELN2017 classification distinguishes the 3 risk groups with significantly distinct prognoses, even after allogeneic HSCT, and emphasizes the dismal prognosis of patients with AML with TP53 mutations, monosomal karyotype, or MRD positivity after allogeneic HSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.