Trial reportBlood advances2020
A phase 3 randomized study (HOMER) of ofatumumab vs rituximab in iNHL relapsed after rituximab-containing therapy.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01200589 (Phase III Randomized, Open Label Study of Single Agent Ofatumumab Vs. Single Agent Rituximab in Indolent B-Cell Non Hodgkin Lymphoma Relapsed After Rituximab-Containing Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase III Randomized, Open Label Study of Single Agent Ofatumumab Vs. Single Agent Rituximab in Indolent B-Cell Non Hodgkin Lymphoma Relapsed After Rituximab-Containing Therapy
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential surrogate endpoint for B-cell hematologic malignancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Chemotherapy-Sparing Strategies in Follicular Lymphoma: Emerging Targeted and Immune-Based Approaches.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Cancer therapy with antibodies.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024Review
- Advancements in cancer immunotherapies targeting CD20: from pioneering monoclonal antibodies to chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Changing Trends in B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment: The Role of Novel Monoclonal Antibodies in Clinical Practice.Cancers · 2023Review
- Update on the Application of Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Primary Membranous Nephropathy.Drugs · 2023Review
- Cancer Immunotherapy Beyond Checkpoint Blockade:JACC. CardioOncology · 2022Review
- B cells and tumor immune escape.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2022Article
- In Silico Designed Gain-of-Function Variants of Complement C2 Support Cytocidal Activity of Anticancer Monoclonal Antibodies.Cancers · 2022Article
- Immunotherapy in indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.Leukemia research reports · 2022Article
- Dual Fc optimization to increase the cytotoxic activity of a CD19-targeting antibody.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Advances in the Management of Primary Membranous Nephropathy and Rituximab-Refractory Membranous Nephropathy.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Prospects in the management of patients with follicular lymphoma beyond first-line therapy.Haematologica · 2022Article
- UK experience of ofatumumab in recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis post-kidney transplant.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2022Article
- Prognostic significance of FCGR2B expression for the response of DLBCL patients to rituximab or obinutuzumab treatment.Blood advances · 2021Article
- Chemotherapy-Free Management of Follicular and Marginal Zone Lymphoma.Cancer management and research · 2021Review
- Role of antibody-based therapy in indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.Leukemia research reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because of high relapse rates with rituximab combinations, there is an unmet need for new therapeutic agents for treatment of indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) or follicular lymphoma (FL). In previous trials, ofatumumab in combination with chemotherapy showed good results in relapsed/refractory FL pretreated with rituximab. This phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of single-agent ofatumumab vs single-agent rituximab in rituximab-sensitive relapsed FL that relapsed at least 6 months after completing the last prior treatment with single-agent rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either ofatumumab (1000 mg) or rituximab (375 mg/m2) every week for 4 weeks for the induction phase, followed by once every 2 months for 4 additional doses. The primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints, overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS), were evaluated. Overall, 438 patients were assigned to receive ofatumumab (n = 219) and rituximab (n = 219). Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms. The independent review committee assessed whether median PFS was shorter in the ofatumumab arm than in the rituximab arm (16.33 vs 21.29 months), with no significant difference (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.49; P = .29) and also showed a lower ORR (50%) compared with the rituximab arm (66%). At the time of analysis, data were not matured for OS results. The number of grade >3 adverse events was higher in the ofatumumab arm (37%) than the rituximab arm (28%). Ofatumumab showed no superiority over rituximab in patients with FL who had relapsed after a rituximab-containing therapy. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01200589.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.