Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32810220›Full record

Trial reportBlood advances2020

A phase 3 randomized study (HOMER) of ofatumumab vs rituximab in iNHL relapsed after rituximab-containing therapy.

David G Maloney, Michinori Ogura, Noriko Fukuhara, Jaclyn Davis, Janet Lasher, Miguel Izquierdo, Hiya Banerjee, Kensei Tobinai

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01200589 (Phase III Randomized, Open Label Study of Single Agent Ofatumumab Vs. Single Agent Rituximab in Indolent B-Cell Non Hodgkin Lymphoma Relapsed After Rituximab-Containing Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01200589 phase3terminatednot on this map

Phase III Randomized, Open Label Study of Single Agent Ofatumumab Vs. Single Agent Rituximab in Indolent B-Cell Non Hodgkin Lymphoma Relapsed After Rituximab-Containing Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2010 to 2016Enrolled438ConditionsNon-Hodgkin's LymphomaArmsOfatumumab, Rituximab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Cancer therapy with antibodies.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. B cells and tumor immune escape.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Immunotherapy in indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.Leukemia research reports · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

David G MaloneyClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Michinori OguraDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Kasugai Municipal Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Noriko FukuharaDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Tohoku University Hospital, Miyagi, Japan.
Jaclyn DavisNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ.
Janet LasherNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ.
Miguel IzquierdoNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; and.
Hiya BanerjeeNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ.
Kensei TobinaiDepartment of Hematology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USKasugai Municipal Hospital · JPNovartis (Switzerland) · CHTohoku University Hospital · JPTokyo National Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of high relapse rates with rituximab combinations, there is an unmet need for new therapeutic agents for treatment of indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) or follicular lymphoma (FL). In previous trials, ofatumumab in combination with chemotherapy showed good results in relapsed/refractory FL pretreated with rituximab. This phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of single-agent ofatumumab vs single-agent rituximab in rituximab-sensitive relapsed FL that relapsed at least 6 months after completing the last prior treatment with single-agent rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either ofatumumab (1000 mg) or rituximab (375 mg/m2) every week for 4 weeks for the induction phase, followed by once every 2 months for 4 additional doses. The primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints, overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS), were evaluated. Overall, 438 patients were assigned to receive ofatumumab (n = 219) and rituximab (n = 219). Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms. The independent review committee assessed whether median PFS was shorter in the ofatumumab arm than in the rituximab arm (16.33 vs 21.29 months), with no significant difference (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.49; P = .29) and also showed a lower ORR (50%) compared with the rituximab arm (66%). At the time of analysis, data were not matured for OS results. The number of grade >3 adverse events was higher in the ofatumumab arm (37%) than the rituximab arm (28%). Ofatumumab showed no superiority over rituximab in patients with FL who had relapsed after a rituximab-containing therapy. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01200589.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, B-CellNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansRituximabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedofatumumabRituximab

Identifiers

PMID32810220
PMCPMC7448588
OpenAlexW3054521279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.