ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2020
A specific combination of dual index adaptors decreases the sensitivity of amplicon sequencing with the Illumina platform.
Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of a long-read amplicon sequencing approach to short-read amplicons for microbiome analysis.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Comparison of a long-read amplicon sequencing approach to short-read amplicons for microbiome analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amplicon sequencing is a powerful approach in microbiome studies as it detects live organisms with high sensitivity. This approach determines the composition of sequence variants of marker genes using high-throughput DNA sequencers. The use of dual index adaptors is the fundamental technique for pooling DNA libraries for Illumina sequencers and is believed not to affect the results. However, here, we observed a decrease of sequence quality in samples containing a specific combination of indexes, namely N704 and S507 in Nextera kits, in multiple runs on the Illumina MiSeq sequencer operated in different facilities. This decrease was also observed when sequencing randomly fragmented DNA of Escherichia coli and was not observed when either individual adaptor was used. Each end of the DNA library with this index combination contains a complementary sequence motif, which potentially inhibits proper cluster generation and/or subsequent sequencing. Community analysis of the 16S and 18S rRNA amplicons using QIIME2 revealed significant decreases in α-diversity in the samples containing the N704/S507 index combination, resulting from loss of low-abundance sequence variants during denoising. Our data underscore the importance of quality validation of sequence reads in developing dual index techniques and suggest cautious interpretation of microbiome data containing low-quality sequence reads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.