ArticleEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2021
Utilization of diagnostic resources and costs in patients with suspected cardiac chest pain.
Article in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of follow-up care for patients presenting with non-typical chest pain at the emergency department.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026Article
- One-Hour Troponin Using a High-Sensitivity Point-of-Care Assay in Emergency Primary Care: The OUT-POC Pilot Study.Cardiology · 2026Article
- Navigating chest pain online: who uses health information and what actions follow?BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Coronary computed tomography angiography in primary care patients with chest pain or dyspnea - a cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using the 0/1-hour algorithm for cardiac troponins in emergency primary care: the OUT-ACS implementation study.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- A Study on the Association Between Risk Factors and Psychosocial Factors of Non-Cardiac Chest Pain (NCCP) in Adults Aged 40 and Above Based on 2013-2018 US NHANES Data.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- How Could Sensor-Based Measurement of Physical Activity Be Used in Cardiovascular Healthcare?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Non-acute chest pain in primary care; referral rates, communication and guideline adherence: a cohort study using routinely collected health data.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Cost-effectiveness of a rule-out algorithm of acute myocardial infarction in low-risk patients: emergency primary care versus hospital setting.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Identifying prognostic factors for clinical outcomes and costs in four high-volume surgical treatments using routinely collected hospital data.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsNon-acute chest pain is a common complaint and can be caused by various conditions. With the rising healthcare expenditures of today, it is necessary to use our healthcare resources effectively. This study aims to give insight into the diagnostic effort and costs for patients with non-acute chest pain. METHODS AND
resultsFinancial data of patients without a cardiac history from four hospitals (January 2012-October 2018), who were registered with the national diagnostic code 'no cardiac pathology' (ICD-10 Z13.6), 'chest wall syndrome' (ICD-10 R07.4), or 'stable angina pectoris' (ICD-10 I20.9) were extracted. In total, 74 091 patients were included for analysis and divided into the following final diagnosis groups: no cardiac pathology: N = 19 688 (age 53 ± 18), 46% male; chest wall syndrome: N = 40 858 (age 56 ± 15), 45% male; and stable angina pectoris (AP): N = 13 545 (age 67 ± 11), 61% male. A total of approximately €142.7 million was spent during diagnostic work-up. The total expenditure during diagnostic effort was €1.97, €8.13, and €10.7 million, respectively for no cardiac pathology, chest wall syndrome, and stable AP per year. After 8 years of follow-up, ≥95% of the patients diagnosed with no cardiac pathology or chest wall syndrome had an (cardiac) ischaemic-free survival.
conclusionThe diagnostic expenditure and clinical effort to ascertain non-cardiac chest pain are high. We should define what we as society find acceptable as 'assurance costs' with an increasing pressure on the healthcare system and costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.