Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32810135›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Antibiotic dosage prescribed in oral implant surgery: A meta-analysis of cross-sectional surveys.

Fabio Rodríguez Sánchez, Iciar Arteagoitia, Wim Teughels, Carlos Rodríguez Andrés, Marc Quirynen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Antibiotic Therapy in Dentistry.International journal of dentistry · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabio Rodríguez SánchezDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9066-8842
Iciar ArteagoitiaDepartment of Stomatology, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1595-6334
Wim TeughelsDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Section Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven & University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Carlos Rodríguez AndrésDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain.
Marc QuirynenDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, Section Periodontology, Catholic University of Leuven & University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
University of the Basque Country · ESKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the dosage and types of antibiotics prescribed in oral implant surgery, compare them among the different subpopulations (country and prescription regimens) and against the evidence-based recommended dosage: a 2-gram single preoperative dose of amoxicillin. A meta-analysis of cross-sectional surveys was conducted, which reports the overall dosage (and type) of antibiotics prescribed in combination with implant placement. PubMed, Cochrane, Science, Direct, and EMBASE via OVID were searched until April 2019. Three reviewers independently undertook data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The outcome variable was set on the average of prophylactic antibiotics prescribed per oral implant surgery. Overall, 726 participants from five cross-sectional surveys, representing five different countries were finally included. Amoxicillin was the most prescribed antibiotic. On average, 10,724 mg of antibiotics were prescribed per implant surgery. This average was significantly (p<0.001) higher than 2,000 mg. Overall, amoxicillin doses were significantly higher than 2,000 mg (9,700 mg, p<0.001). All prescribed amoxicillin regimens independently contained more than 2,000 mg, including those comprising only preoperative amoxicillin (2,175 mg, p = 0.006). Exclusive preoperative antibiotic regimens were the only subgroup with prescription dosages below this threshold (p = 0.091). Significant variations in antibiotic prescriptions were found among different countries and antibiotic regimens (p<0.001). In conclusion, the average dose of antibiotics prescribed per oral implant surgery was larger than the evidence-based recommended dose in healthy patients and straightforward conditions. In addition, variations in the average antibiotic dosages were found among different countries and prescription regimens.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisCross-Sectional StudiesEvidence-Based DentistryHumansOral Surgical ProceduresSurveys and QuestionnairesAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsDental Implants

Identifiers

PMID32810135
PMCPMC7446810
OpenAlexW3063942737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.