Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32809265›Full record

ArticleCancer cytopathology2021

Evaluation of NR4A3 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparison with DOG1 IHC for FNA diagnosis of acinic cell carcinoma.

John M Skaugen, Raja R Seethala, Simion I Chiosea, Michael S Landau

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cytopathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Oncocytic salivary gland carcinomas.Histology and histopathology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular testing of soft tissue tumors.Diagnostic cytopathology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Analysis of clinicopathologic features and expression of NR4A3 in sinonasal acinic cell carcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John M SkaugenDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Raja R SeethalaDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Simion I ChioseaDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Michael S LandauDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-2871-5409
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jessie Nedrow · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcinic cell carcinoma (AcCC) is diagnostically challenging on fine-needle aspiration because it can mimic several other neoplasms or even normal acinar tissue. Immunopositivity for DOG1, especially circumferential membranous staining, can support the diagnosis of AcCC but is not entirely specific, and it is prone to technical and interpretive challenges on small specimens. NR4A3 (nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 3) translocation and nuclear NR4A3 overexpression were recently described in the majority of AcCCs. Here, the authors evaluate the performance of NR4A3 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and NR4A3 break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on cell block preparations and compare them with DOG1 IHC in distinguishing AcCC from other entities in the differential diagnosis.

methodsThe authors identified 34 cytology cell blocks with lesional cells, including 11 specimens of AcCC (2 of which derived from 1 patient and showed high-grade transformation) as well as 2 secretory carcinomas, 7 salivary duct carcinomas, 4 mucoepidermoid carcinomas, 3 oncocytomas, 3 renal cell carcinomas, and 6 specimens containing nonneoplastic salivary gland tissue. NR4A3 IHC, DOG1 IHC, and NR4A3 FISH were attempted for all cases.

resultsNR4A3 IHC had 81.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity for AcCC, whereas NR4A3 FISH had 36.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity, although 4 cases (3 mucoepidermoid carcinomas and 1 salivary gland tissue sample) could not be analyzed because of low cellularity. Notably, no normal acinar tissue specimens showed NR4A3 positivity by IHC or FISH. In addition, DOG1 IHC had 72.7% sensitivity and 92% specificity.

conclusionsNR4A3 IHC is highly specific for the diagnosis of AcCC and is more sensitive than DOG1 IHC and NR4A3 FISH. In addition, NR4A3 IHC performance is not improved by the inclusion of DOG1 IHC. Finally, NR4A3 positivity resolves the perennial problem of distinguishing AcCC from normal acinar tissue.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsy, Fine-NeedleCarcinoma, Acinar CellDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, SteroidReceptors, Thyroid HormoneSensitivity and SpecificityDNA-Binding ProteinsNR4A3 protein, humanReceptors, SteroidReceptors, Thyroid Hormoneacinic cell carcinomacytologyDOG1nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 3 (NR4A3)salivary gland

Identifiers

PMID32809265
PMCPMC11542558
OpenAlexW3064297110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.