Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32809165›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2021

Prognostic value of

Sangwon Han, Sungmin Woo, Yong-Il Kim, Dok Hyun Yoon, Jin-Sook Ryu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Advanced Imaging in Multiple Myeloma: New Frontiers for MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Impact of Focal Lesions on Overall and Progression-free Survival in Multiple Myeloma.Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sangwon HanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Sungmin WooDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Yong-Il KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Dok Hyun YoonDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jin-Sook RyuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea. jsryu2@amc.seoul.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8339-2809
Ulsan College · KRMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prognostic values of

methodsPubMed and Embase were searched until July 10, 2019, for studies that reported the prognostic significance of

resultsFifteen studies (1670 patients) were included for qualitative synthesis. Among multiple PET parameters, the presence of extramedullary disease (EMD), more than three focal lesions (FLs), and high FDG uptake were widely evaluated and significantly associated with shorter OS and PFS in most of the included studies. Among 11 studies included in quantitative synthesis, the overall HRs of EMD, more than three FLs, and high FDG uptake on PFS were 2.12 (95% CI, 1.52-2.96), 2.38 (95% CI, 1.84-3.07), and 2.02 (95% CI, 1.51-2.68), respectively. The pooled HRs of those three parameters on OS were 2.37 (95% CI, 1.77-3.16), 3.29 (95% CI, 2.38-4.56), and 2.28 (95% CI, 1.67-3.13). No statistical differences were found across parameters for either PFS (p = 0.6822) or OS (p = 0.2147).

conclusionsPretreatment KEY POINTS: • There remain unmet clinical needs for reliable prognostic biomarkers in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. • This meta-analysis shows that the presence of extramedullary disease, more than three focal lesions, and high FDG uptake from baseline

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Multiple MyelomaHumansPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Multiple myelomaPositron-emission tomographyPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID32809165
OpenAlexW3051385327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.