Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32809136›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2020

Conservative oxygen therapy for mechanically ventilated adults with suspected hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy.

Paul Young, Diane Mackle, Rinaldo Bellomo, Michael Bailey, Richard Beasley, Adam Deane, Glenn Eastwood, Simon Finfer, Ross Freebairn, Victoria King and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. A logical interpretation of the data on optimal oxygen therapy targets for unresponsive adults in ICU after cardiac arrest.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul YoungMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand. paul.young@ccdhb.org.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-3428-3083
Diane MackleMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Rinaldo BellomoAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Michael BaileyAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Richard BeasleyMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Adam DeaneUniversity of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Glenn EastwoodAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Simon FinferDivision of Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ross FreebairnIntensive Care Unit, Hawkes Bay Hospital, Hastings, New Zealand.
Victoria KingAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Natalie LinkeAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Edward LittonIntensive Care Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia.
Colin McArthurMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Shay McGuinnessMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Rakshit PanwarIntensive Care Unit, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
ICU-ROX Investigators and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society · AUWellington Hospital · NZAuckland City Hospital · NZThe University of Melbourne · AUMedical Research Institute of New Zealand · NZAustin Hospital · AUFiona Stanley Hospital · AUHawke's Bay Hospital · NZJohn Hunter Hospital · AURoyal North Shore Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLiberal use of oxygen may contribute to secondary brain injury in patients with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). However, there are limited data on the effect of different oxygen regimens on survival and neurological disability in HIE patients.

methodsWe undertook a post-hoc analysis of the 166 patients with suspected HIE enrolled in a trial comparing conservative oxygen therapy with usual oxygen therapy in 1000 mechanically ventilated ICU patients. The primary endpoint for the current analysis was death or unfavourable neurological outcome at day 180. Key secondary outcomes were day 180 mortality, and cause-specific mortality.

resultsPatients with HIE allocated to conservative oxygen spent less time in the ICU with an SpO

conclusionsConservative oxygen therapy was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in death or unfavourable neurological outcomes at day 180. The potential for important benefit or harm from conservative oxygen therapy in HIE patients is not excluded by these data.

Indexed as

Hypoxia-Ischemia, BrainAdultConservative TreatmentHumansOxygenOxygen Inhalation TherapyRespiration, ArtificialOxygenCardiac arrestCritical careHypoxic ischemic encephalopathyIntensive care medicineOxygen therapyRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID32809136
PMCPMC7431900
OpenAlexW3068445698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.