Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32809134›Full record

SynthesisClinical journal of gastroenterology2020

After you Roux, what do you do? A systematic review of most successful advanced assisted ERCP techniques in patients with various altered upper gastrointestinal surgical anatomical reconstructions with particular focus on RYGB (last 10 years).

Mohamed Elsharif, Adam Gary Hague, Hussam Ahmed, Roger Ackroyd

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohamed ElsharifDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Flat 2, 23 Montgomery Road, Sheffield, S71LN, UK. wadaltaher@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8413-1862
Adam Gary HagueDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Flat 2, 23 Montgomery Road, Sheffield, S71LN, UK.
Hussam AhmedDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Flat 2, 23 Montgomery Road, Sheffield, S71LN, UK.
Roger AckroydDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Flat 2, 23 Montgomery Road, Sheffield, S71LN, UK.
Northern General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to the Common Bile Duct in patients with surgically altered UGI anatomy such as RYGB is exceptionally challenging. Previously, these patients could only be treated by open surgery; however, multiple new advanced assisted ERCP techniques such as EDGE, LA-ERCP, and DEA-ERCP have now been developed and indeed successfully used to treat these patients. Despite growing experience, these techniques have yet to become part of our mainstream practice and many clinicians remain unfamiliar or even unaware of them; as a result, they are unfortunately often overlooked. We conducted this systematic review to try and shed more light on them and understand which of these techniques resulted in the best patient outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed database publications between December 2008 and December 2018. Keyword variants of "EDGE, Enteroscopy-assisted & laparoscopy-assisted ERCP" and "altered surgical anatomy" were combined to identify relevant papers for inclusion. We identified 34 studies, comprising a total of 1848 advanced assisted ERCPs in patients with altered UGI anatomy from 12 different countries. These papers were critically appraised, summarised, and presented in table format. EDGE and LA-ERCP were associated with both the highest overall combined CBD cannulation rates (99.3% for both vs 74.6% for DEA-ERCP) and ERCP interventional success (98.3% for EDGE vs 97.4% for LA-ERCP and 67.6% for DEA-ERCP). Advanced ERCP is associated with excellent success rates and a higher safety profile than surgery; however, patient selection and identification of the exact surgical anatomy are key.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassLaparoscopyCatheterizationCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeEndoscopy, GastrointestinalHumansAltered surgical anatomyDEA-ERCPEDGELA-ERCPRoux en y

Identifiers

PMID32809134
OpenAlexW3073225825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.