Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32809083›Full record

Article3D printing in medicine2020

Treatment of dorsally dislocated distal radius fractures with individualized 3D printed bracing: an exploratory study.

H M J Janzing, S A M Bessems, M A P Ligthart, E M M Van Lieshout, H P Theeuwes, D G Barten, M H J Verhofstad

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03848702 (Nonoperative Treatment of Dorsally Dislocated Distal Radius Fractures in Adults With an Individualized 3D Printed Brace; a Tolerability Study in Healthy Volunteers and Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03848702 nacompletednot on this map

Nonoperative Treatment of Dorsally Dislocated Distal Radius Fractures in Adults With an Individualized 3D Printed Brace; a Tolerability Study in Healthy Volunteers and Patients (DRFB)

TypeinterventionalSponsorVieCuri Medical CentreRan2017 to 2018Enrolled15ConditionsDorsal DisplacementArmsDistal radius fracture brace
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. [3D printing/implants in traumatology].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

H M J JanzingDepartment of Surgery, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands. hjanzing@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0195-5840
S A M BessemsDepartment of Surgery, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands.
M A P LigthartDepartment of Surgery, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands.
E M M Van LieshoutTrauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
H P TheeuwesDepartment of Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
D G BartenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands.
M H J VerhofstadTrauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
VieCuri Medisch Centrum · NLErasmus MC · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this work was to develop a three-dimensionally (3D) printed brace for the acute treatment of dorsally dislocated and correctly reduced distal radius fractures (DRF). The hypothesis was that a brace shaped to the mirror image of the contralateral (non-fractured) wrist will have an optimal anatomical fit, resulting in improved comfort and lower rates of secondary fracture displacement.

methodValidation: the circumference of both wrists and comfort of the brace were studied in healthy volunteers and effectiveness of the brace was evaluated in an ex vivo fracture model. Clinical study: the brace was tested for comfort and effectiveness in patients with a well reduced unstable DRF.

resultsValidation: the circumference of both wrists may be different, the brace retained the reduction in the ex vivo fracture model and was well tolerated in the volunteers. Clinical study: in DRF patients comfort scores were lower and pain scores higher compared to the healthy volunteers. After 3 and 5 weeks all patients were independent in ADL according to the Katz-index. Posttraumatic swelling subsided in the first week. In two of the five patients secondary fracture dislocation occurred.

conclusionsTreatment of a dislocated DRF in the acute setting (day one) with a custom-made 3D printed brace, anatomically modelled from a 3D scan of the contralateral wrist, is possible. Difference between both wrists and posttraumatic swelling must be adapted for. The high rate of secondary fracture displacement led to early discontinuation of the study and a small sample size.

trial registrationName of the registry: ClinicalTrials.Gov Trial registration number: NCT03848702 Date of registration: 02/21/2019, retrospectively registered.

Identifiers

PMID32809083
PMCPMC7437166
OpenAlexW3072833103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.