Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32809079›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Combining the best interest standard with shared decision-making in paediatrics-introducing the shared optimum approach based on a qualitative study.

Jürg Caspar Streuli, James Anderson, Sierra Alef-Defoe, Eva Bergsträsser, Jovana Jucker, Stephanie Meyer, Sophia Chaksad-Weiland, Effy Vayena

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jürg Caspar StreuliDepartment of Bioethics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. streuli@ethik.uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7586-9542
James AndersonDepartment of Bioethics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Sierra Alef-DefoeInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eva BergsträsserUniversity Children's Hospital and Children's Research Center, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jovana JuckerInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stephanie MeyerUniversity Children's Hospital and Children's Research Center, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sophia Chaksad-WeilandInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
Effy VayenaDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

Starr International Foundation n/aThinkSwiss research scholarship n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paediatric decision-making is the art of respecting the interests of child and family with due regard for evidence, values and beliefs, reconciled using two important but potentially conflicting concepts: best interest standard (BIS) and shared decision-making (SD-M). We combine qualitative research, our own data and the normative framework of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Children (UNCRC) to revisit current theoretical debate on the interrelationship of BIS and SD-M. Three cohorts of child, parent and health care professional interviewees (N

Indexed as

Decision MakingPediatricsChildHumansParentsQualitative ResearchSwitzerlandUnited StatesBest interest standardPaediatric ethicsParental authorityQualitative researchShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID32809079
PMCPMC7886834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.