Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32809058›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2020

Faculty Development: How Do We Encourage Faculty to Become Better Teachers and Mentors?

Alana M Murphy, Patrick J Shenot, Costas D Lallas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alana M MurphyDepartment of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, suite 1100, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Patrick J ShenotDepartment of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, suite 1100, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Costas D LallasDepartment of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, suite 1100, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. costas.lallas@jefferson.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewA healthy mentor relationship is a mutually beneficial experience and a necessary part of the natural progression of a career in academic medicine. We sought to explore the advantages of and challenges to becoming a mentor in current academic urology. RECENT

findingsMentorship can promote self-confidence in the ability to choose a career, drive academic productivity, and even inspire a career in academic medicine. It is necessary to help promote advancement in diverse socioeconomic groups within medical trainees. Strong mentors can serve as role models to the next generation of doctors. However, the ability to be an effective mentor is being challenged in today's world of academic medicine. By staying current with the issues surrounding mentorship, an individual can be fulfilled and successful in training and guiding doctors into the new era of medicine.

Indexed as

Faculty, MedicalMentorsStudents, MedicalCareer ChoiceHumansInterpersonal RelationsUrologyAcademic medicineCareer counselingDiversityMentorMentorship

Identifiers

PMID32809058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.