SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021
Preliminary comparison of the efficacy of several surgical treatments based on maxillomandibular advancement procedures in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sleep-Related Breathing Disorders: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical Innovations and Evolving Technologies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2024).World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Orthognathic Surgery in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Original Research.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the efficacy of eight different surgical treatments based on maxillomandibular advancement (MMA), which has emerged in recent years, for adult obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) patients.
methodsThe literature was searched from January 2010 to May 2020 for studies of adult OSA patients with different types of MMA procedures to perform a network meta-analysis. The outcomes were changes in the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), the lowest pulse oxygen saturation (SpO
resultsEight studies were included and encompassed a total of 227 adult patients diagnosed with OSA. Among them, 225 patients underwent combined surgery or simple MMA surgery, including modified maxillomandibular advancement (MMMA),counterclockwise maxillomandibular advancement (CMMA), drug-induced sleep endoscopy and maxillomandibular advancement (MMA + DISE), transoral robotic surgery and maxillomandibular advancement (MMA + TORS), uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP), maxillomandibular advancement and uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (MMA + UPPP), uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with uvula preservation and maxillomandibular advancement (MMA + HUPPP); MMA consisting of Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral inverted-L osteotomy (ILOs), genioplasty and iliac bone grafting; and MMA consisting of Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies and genioplasty. The results showed that the most effective surgical treatment is MMA + HUPPP [- 56.79 (WMD); 95% confidence interval (CI): - 113.02 to - 3.33] (P < 0.00001), which was far superior to other approaches.
conclusionMMA combined with HUPPP had the highest efficacy. The MMA consisted of Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies and genioplasty; CMMA and MMA + TORS are likely also great choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32809057What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.