Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32809046›Full record

SynthesisPsychopharmacology2020

Potential shortcomings in current studies on the effect of intranasal oxytocin in Anorexia Nervosa and healthy controls - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Katharina Collin Hasselbalch, Klara Rasmussen Lanng, Margrete Birkeland, Magnus Sjögren

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Brain serotonin, oxytocin, and their interaction: Relevance for eating disorders.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Review
  4. Oxytocin and Bone: Review and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katharina Collin HasselbalchMental Health Center Ballerup, Maglevaenget 32, 2750, Ballerup, Denmark.
Klara Rasmussen LanngMental Health Center Ballerup, Maglevaenget 32, 2750, Ballerup, Denmark.
Margrete BirkelandMental Health Center Ballerup, Maglevaenget 32, 2750, Ballerup, Denmark.
Magnus SjögrenMental Health Center Ballerup, Maglevaenget 32, 2750, Ballerup, Denmark. jan.magnus.sjoegren@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2060-1914
Center for Clinical & Basic Research · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe psychopathology of anorexia nervosa (AN) includes altered social cognition and information processing of fear and anxiety. Oxytocin, a neuromodulating hormone, may influence these functions and could be valuable for the treatment of AN.

objectiveThe current study aimed at reviewing the effect of intranasal oxytocin (IN-OT) on attentional bias (AB) and emotion recognition (ER) in AN.

methodsA systematic literature review was done for free-text and the MeSH-terms: anorexia nervosa, feeding and eating disorders, and oxytocin. Six publications, reporting from 4 unique clinical trials, were included in this review. A meta-analysis was conducted to examine the effects of IN-OT on AB towards food images and ER on healthy controls (HC) and patients with AN.

resultsOverall, IN-OT did not influence AB towards food images (effect size = 0.20 [- 0.16, 0.57], p = 0.28) and had no effect on ER (effect size = - 0.01 [- 0.27, 0.26], p = 0.97) in patients with AN and healthy control (HC) subjects collectively. Assessing HC and AN separately in subgroup analyses did not show any significant effect on AB and ER in neither of the subgroups. All tests were done between 15 and 55 min post-administration of IN-OT, while peak concentration in the cerebrospinal fluid has been determined to be at 75 min.

conclusionThe current level of evidence is moderate showing no effect of IN-OT on AB or ER in AN. However, brain exposure may not have been sufficient which future studies with IN-OT need to ensure by considering dose and dose-to-task interval.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAnorexia NervosaAnxietyAttentional BiasBrainFearHealthy VolunteersHumansOxytocicsOxytocinTreatment OutcomeOxytocicsOxytocinAnorexia NervosaAttentional biasEating disordersEmotion recognitionOxytocin

Identifiers

PMID32809046
OpenAlexW3057014371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.