Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32809038›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2020

[Structures of endovascular recanalization in Germany : Cross-sectional survey of certified stroke units 2016-2018].

D G Nabavi, O Busse

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D G NabaviKlinik für Neurologie mit Stroke Unit, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Rudower Str. 48, 12351, Berlin, Deutschland. Darius.Nabavi@vivantes.de.
O BusseDeutsche Schlaganfallgesellschaft, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this cross-sectional study data from 299 certified stroke units (SU) in Germany were analyzed from January 2016 to December 2018 and included comprehensive stroke centers (CSC 34%), local SU (62%), and telemedical SU (4%). In a total of 2487 SU monitor beds, 251,539 cases of stroke treatment were documented. The number of monitor beds (10.8 vs. 7.2) and stroke cases per year (1143 vs. 708) were significantly higher in CSC than in local SU. A total of 9251 endovascular recanalization (ER) procedures were performed annually by 475 interventionalists. The overall rate of ER was 3.7% of all stroke cases, including intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and transient ischemic attacks (TIA). A total of 124 of the SUs (41.5%) had a 24/7 ER structure in which 55% of all stroke treatments and 96% of all ERs were carried out. In the vast majority of CSC the ER structure was robust (≥4 interventionalists, 52%) or acceptable (3 interventionalists, 27%). In contrast, the majority of local SU (88%) had to transfer patients for ER over average distances of 40 km (range 1-160 km). Overall, the ER structures in Germany between 2016 and 2018 could be described as good to very good.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresIschemic Attack, TransientStrokeCross-Sectional StudiesGermanyHumansRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesThrombectomyTreatment OutcomeCertificationMechanical thrombectomyReferral conceptStrokeTransfer distance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.