Trial reportJAMA2020
Effect of Ascorbic Acid, Corticosteroids, and Thiamine on Organ Injury in Septic Shock: The ACTS Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 118 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ascorbic Ccid, Hydrocortisone, and Thiamine in Sepsis and Septic Shock - A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
High-Dose Vitamin C Treatment in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients, A Retrospective Cohort Study
Corticosteroids to Reduce Inflammation in Severe Pancreatitis: A Randomized, Controlled Study
Impact of Thiamine Supplementation on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Septic Shock: a Retrospective Before-after Study
Effect of Vitamin C in the Prevention and Treatment for Bruises in Patients With Ischemic Stroke: A Double-blind Randomized Control Trial
Who cites it
118 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 242 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corticosteroids for treating sepsis in children and adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of different vitamins on individuals with septic shock: a Bayesian NMA of RCTs.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Therapeutic Role of HAT Therapy in Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Hydrocortisone, Ascorbic Acid, and Thiamine Combination Therapy for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2024Pooled it
- The outcome of IV vitamin C therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of intravenous vitamin C on adult septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- IV Vitamin C in Sepsis: A Latest Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of clinical practice · 2023Pooled it
- The Role and Efficacy of Vitamin C in Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of adjunctive vitamin C, glucocorticoids, and vitamin B1 on longer-term mortality in adults with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and a component network meta-analysis.Intensive care medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Vitamin C in Critically Ill Patients: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2021Pooled it
- Steroid, ascorbic acid, and thiamine in adults with sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Mortality in septic patients treated with vitamin C: a systematic meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy of Ascorbic Acid, Thiamine, and Hydrocortisone Combination Therapy: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Pooled it
- Early high-dose vitamin C for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the VITaCCA randomized clinical trial.Intensive care medicine · 2026Trial
- Early administration of vitamin C in patients with sepsis or septic shock in emergency departments: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial: the C-EASIE trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Thiamine for Renal Protection in Septic Shock (TRPSS): A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Clinical Trial.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Remote ischemic conditioning in septic shock: the RECO-Sepsis randomized clinical trial.Intensive care medicine · 2022Trial
- Early administration of hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and thiamine in adult patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Trial
- Evaluating Vitamin C in Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Vitamin C Monotherapy.Critical care medicine · 2022Trial
58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
importanceThe combination of ascorbic acid, corticosteroids, and thiamine has been identified as a potential therapy for septic shock.
objectiveTo determine whether the combination of ascorbic acid, corticosteroids, and thiamine attenuates organ injury in patients with septic shock. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsRandomized, blinded, multicenter clinical trial of ascorbic acid, corticosteroids, and thiamine vs placebo for adult patients with septic shock. Two hundred five patients were enrolled between February 9, 2018, and October 27, 2019, at 14 centers in the United States. Follow-up continued until November 26, 2019.
interventionsPatients were randomly assigned to receive parenteral ascorbic acid (1500 mg), hydrocortisone (50 mg), and thiamine (100 mg) every 6 hours for 4 days (n = 103) or placebo in matching volumes at the same time points (n = 102). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (range, 0-24; 0 = best) between enrollment and 72 hours. Key secondary outcomes included kidney failure and 30-day mortality. Patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug were included in analyses.
resultsAmong 205 randomized patients (mean age, 68 [SD, 15] years; 90 [44%] women), 200 (98%) received at least 1 dose of study drug, completed the trial, and were included in the analyses (101 with intervention and 99 with placebo group). Overall, there was no statistically significant interaction between time and treatment group with regard to SOFA score over the 72 hours after enrollment (mean SOFA score change from 9.1 to 4.4 [-4.7] points with intervention vs 9.2 to 5.1 [-4.1] points with placebo; adjusted mean difference, -0.8; 95% CI, -1.7 to 0.2; P = .12 for interaction). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of kidney failure (31.7% with intervention vs 27.3% with placebo; adjusted risk difference, 0.03; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.2; P = .58) or in 30-day mortality (34.7% vs 29.3%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8-2.2; P = .26). The most common serious adverse events were hyperglycemia (12 patients with intervention and 7 patients with placebo), hypernatremia (11 and 7 patients, respectively), and new hospital-acquired infection (13 and 12 patients, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients with septic shock, the combination of ascorbic acid, corticosteroids, and thiamine, compared with placebo, did not result in a statistically significant reduction in SOFA score during the first 72 hours after enrollment. These data do not support routine use of this combination therapy for patients with septic shock.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03389555.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.