Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32808935›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2020

Twitter-Derived Social Neighborhood Characteristics and Individual-Level Cardiometabolic Outcomes: Cross-Sectional Study in a Nationally Representative Sample.

Dina Huang, Yuru Huang, Sahil Khanna, Pallavi Dwivedi, Natalie Slopen, Kerry M Green, Xin He, Robin Puett, Quynh Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dina HuangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8165-8231
Yuru HuangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6800-0272
Sahil KhannaA. James Clark School of Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1578-0498
Pallavi DwivediDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6658-334X
Natalie SlopenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5644-6007
Kerry M GreenDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7146-5783
Xin HeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9814-1666
Robin PuettMaryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3418-4341
Quynh NguyenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4745-6681

Funding

Sci-Tech Core-Maryland Population Research CenterP2CHD041041 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MICHAEL S. RENDALL · 2018 to 2026
$3.9M
Neighborhood Looking Glass: 360 Degree Automated Characterization of the Built Environment for Neighborhood Effects ResearchR01LM012849 · NLM · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI NGUYEN, QUYNH · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
HashtagHealth: A Social Media Big Data Resource for Neighborhood Effects ResearchK01ES025433 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI NGUYEN, QUYNH · 2014 to 2018
$816k
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041041NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES025433NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial media platforms such as Twitter can serve as a potential data source for public health research to characterize the social neighborhood environment. Few studies have linked Twitter-derived characteristics to individual-level health outcomes.

objectiveThis study aims to assess the association between Twitter-derived social neighborhood characteristics, including happiness, food, and physical activity mentions, with individual cardiometabolic outcomes using a nationally representative sample.

methodsWe collected a random 1% of the geotagged tweets from April 2015 to March 2016 using Twitter's Streaming Application Interface (API). Twitter-derived zip code characteristics on happiness, food, and physical activity were merged to individual outcomes from restricted-use National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with residential zip codes. Separate regression analyses were performed for each of the neighborhood characteristics using NHANES 2011-2016 and 2007-2016.

resultsIndividuals living in the zip codes with the two highest tertiles of happy tweets reported BMI of 0.65 (95% CI -1.10 to -0.20) and 0.85 kg/m

conclusionsTwitter-derived social neighborhood characteristics were associated with individual-level obesity and hypertension in a nationally representative sample of US adults. Twitter data could be used for capturing neighborhood sociocultural influences on chronic conditions and may be used as a platform for chronic outcomes prevention.

Indexed as

Sociological FactorsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesData MiningFemaleHumansMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedPrevalenceResidence CharacteristicsSocial MediaSurveys and Questionnairescardiometabolic outcomesneighborhood studyTwitter

Identifiers

PMID32808935
PMCPMC7485998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.