Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32808805›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2021

Aetiology, prevalence, fracture site and management of maxillofacial trauma.

S Kanala, S Gudipalli, P Perumalla, K Jagalanki, P V Polamarasetty, S Guntaka, A Gudala, R P Boyapati

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The epidemiology of alcohol involved facial injuries.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A Retrospective Evaluation of Mandibular Fracture in Kabul, Afghanistan.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S KanalaGovernment Dental College and Hospital, Vijayawada, India.
S GudipalliGovernment Dental College and Hospital, Vijayawada, India.
P PerumallaGovernment Dental College and Hospital, Vijayawada, India.
K JagalankiGovernment Dental College and Hospital, Vijayawada, India.
P V PolamarasettyGovernment Dental College and Hospital, Vijayawada, India.
S GuntakaGovernment Dental College and Hospital, Vijayawada, India.
A GudalaGovernment Dental College and Hospital, Vijayawada, India.
R P BoyapatiQueen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Government Dental College and Hospital · INQueen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMaxillofacial fractures are often associated with severe morbidity, functional deficit, disfigurement and significant financial implications. The aim of this review was to investigate whether the aetiology, prevalence and management modalities of facial trauma can identify the common causes of facial trauma with a view to recommending measures to the appropriate governing bodies to change the current practice wherever possible.

methodsThe records of 1,112 patients referred to our oral and maxillofacial unit in Andhra Pradesh, India, between February 2008 and October 2017 were analysed retrospectively. Data including age, sex, aetiology, fracture site and treatment were evaluated.

resultsMen aged 20-40 years were the most common victims of facial trauma. Road traffic accidents (RTAs) were responsible in 70% of cases. Mandibular fractures constituted 47% of the overall fractures, and 55% of the total fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation.

conclusionsThe main cause of maxillofacial injury among patients reporting to our hospital was RTAs. Mandibular fractures were the most common, accounting for almost half of the cases. Over half (55%) of all maxillofacial fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Reasons for this high frequency may include the large number of poorly maintained, overloaded vehicles on unsuitable roads, violation of traffic regulations (particularly by inexperienced young drivers), abuse of alcohol or other intoxicating agents and the sociocultural behaviours of some drivers.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionAggressive DrivingChildChild, PreschoolDriving Under the InfluenceFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalHumansIndiaMaleMaxillofacial InjuriesFacial fracturesFracturesMaxillofacial trauma

Identifiers

PMID32808805
PMCPMC7705151
OpenAlexW3061569546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.