Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32808495›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2020

Survival implication of lymphadenectomy in patients surgically treated for apparent early-stage uterine serous carcinoma.

Jvan Casarin, Giorgio Bogani, Elisa Piovano, Francesca Falcone, Federico Ferrari, Franco Odicino, Andrea Puppo, Ferdinando Bonfiglio, Nicoletta Donadello, Ciro Pinelli and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Robotic single-site surgery versus laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in early-stage endometrial cancer: a case-control study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Jvan CasarinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy. j.casarin@uninsubria.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9519-1097
Giorgio BoganiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8373-8569
Elisa PiovanoObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Regina Montis Regalis Hospital, Mondovì, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5629-703X
Francesca FalconeDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCSS, "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3729-2321
Federico FerrariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7065-2432
Franco OdicinoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8870-4739
Andrea PuppoObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Regina Montis Regalis Hospital, Mondovì, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1714-7765
Ferdinando BonfiglioDepartment of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2488-3867
Nicoletta DonadelloDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0091-190X
Ciro PinelliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2375-9522
Antonio Simone LaganàDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1543-2802
Antonino DittoDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5684-8225
Mario MalzoniEndoscopica Malzoni - Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecological Surgery, Avellino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2514-7159
Stefano GreggiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCSS, "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5601-5111
Francesco RaspagliesiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8953-1657
Fabio GhezziDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3949-5410
University of Insubria · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITRegina General Hospital · CAIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITUnidad de Cirugía Artroscópica · ESUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUterine serous carcinoma (USC) is a rare highly aggressive disease. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the survival implication of the systematic lymphadenectomy in patients who underwent surgery for apparent early-stage USC.

methodsConsecutive patients with apparent early-stage USC surgically treated at six Italian referral cancer centers were analyzed. A comparison was made between patients who underwent retroperitoneal staging including at least pelvic lymphadenectomy "LND" vs. those who underwent hysterectomy alone "NO-LND". Baseline, surgical and oncological outcomes were analyzed. Kaplan- Meier curves were calculated for disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Associations were evaluated with Cox proportional hazard regression and summarized using hazard ratio (HR).

resultsOne hundred forty patients were analyzed, 106 LND and 34 NO-LND. NO-LND group (compared to LND group) included older patients (median age, 73 vs.67 years) and with higher comorbidities (median Charlson Comorbidity Index, 6 vs. 5) (p<0.001). No differences in terms of recurrence rate (LND vs. NO-LND, 33.1% vs. 41.4%; p=0.240) were observed. At Cox regression analysis lymphadenectomy did not significantly influence DFS (HR=0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.32-1.08; p=0.09), and DSS (HR=0.14; 95% CI=0.02-1.21; multivariable analysis p=0.07). Positive node was independently associated with worse DFS (HR=6.22; 95% CI=3.08-12.60; p<0.001) and DSS (HR=5.51; 95% CI=2.31-13.10; p<0.001), while adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved DFS (HR=0.38; 95% CI=0.17-0.86; p=0.02) and age was independently associated with worse DSS (HR=1.07; 95% CI=1.02-1.13; p<0.001).

conclusionsAlthough lymphadenectomy did not show survival benefits in patients who underwent surgery for apparent early-stage USC, the presence of lymph node metastasis was the main adverse prognostic factors, supporting the prognostic role of the retroperitoneal staging also in this histological subtype.

Indexed as

Cystadenocarcinoma, SerousLymph NodesUterine NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansHysterectomyLymph Node ExcisionMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateEndometrial NeoplasmsGynecologyLymphadenectomySurvivalTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID32808495
PMCPMC7440990
OpenAlexW3024686453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.