Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32808455›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2020

A national research centre for the evaluation and implementation of person-centred care: Content from the first interventional studies.

Hanna Gyllensten, Ida Björkman, Eva Jakobsson Ung, Inger Ekman, Sofie Jakobsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Practising the ethics of person-centred care balancing ethical conviction and moral obligations.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Commentary: how person-centred is pharmaceutical care?International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2022
    Article
  17. Interactional practices in person-centred care: Conversation analysis of nurse-patient disagreement during self-management support.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  18. A national research centre for the evaluation and implementation of person-centred care: Content from the first interventional studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hanna GyllenstenCentre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6890-5162
Ida BjörkmanCentre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3171-683X
Eva Jakobsson UngCentre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8955-6552
Inger EkmanCentre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5559-5203
Sofie JakobssonCentre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5223-6363

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerson-centred care (PCC) has been suggested as a potential means to improve the care of patients with chronic and long-term disorders. In this regard, a model for PCC was developed by the University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC).

objectiveThe present study aimed to explore the theoretical frameworks, designs, contexts and intervention characteristics in the first 27 interventional studies conducted based on the ethics for person-centredness provided by the GPCC.

designCross-sectional study. SETTING AND

participantsA questionnaire to the principal investigators of the 27 intervention studies financed by the GPCC and conducted between 2010 and 2016.

main outcome measuresTheoretical frameworks, contexts of studies, person-centred ethic, and outcome measures.

resultsMost of the interventions were based on the same ethical assumptions for person-centredness but theories and models in applying the interventions differed. All studies were controlled; 12 randomized and 15 quasi-experimental. Hospital in- and outpatient and primary care settings were represented and the outcome measures were related to the specific theories used. A complexity in designing, introducing and evaluating PCC interventions was evident.

conclusionThe frameworks, designs and interventions in the studies were in line with the established ethical basis of PCC, whereas outcome measures varied widely. Consensus discussions among researchers in the field are needed to make comparisons between studies feasible. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: Patients or the public made no direct contributions, although most of the studied projects included such initiatives.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CareSelf CareCross-Sectional StudiesHumansResearchSurveys and Questionnairesclinical trialsinterdisciplinary researchpatient-centred careperson-centred caresurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID32808455
PMCPMC7696144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.