Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32808239›Full record

Observational studyBreast cancer research and treatment2020

Overall survival analysis in patients with metastatic breast cancer and liver or lung metastases treated with eribulin, gemcitabine, or capecitabine.

Shayma Kazmi, Debanjana Chatterjee, Dheeraj Raju, Rob Hauser, Peter A Kaufman

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06471673 (A Study of BRIA-OTS Cellular Immunotherapy in Metastatic Recurrent Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06471673 phase1 / phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Study of BRIA-OTS Cellular Immunotherapy in Metastatic Recurrent Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorBriaCell Therapeutics CorporationRan2024 to 2025Enrolled18ConditionsBreast Cancer, Breast Tumor, Cancer of Breast, Cancer of the BreastArmsBC1 cell line, Bria-OTS regimen and CPI (tislelizumab), Bria-OTS regimen and CPI (tislelizumab) expansion cohort
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shayma KazmiCancer Treatment Centers of America, Philadelphia, PA, USA. shayma.kazmi@ctca-hope.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6591-2965
Debanjana ChatterjeeUS Health Economics Outcomes Research and Real World Evidence, Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.
Dheeraj RajuCancer Treatment Centers of America Global, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Rob HauserCancer Treatment Centers of America Global, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Peter A KaufmanLarner College of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT, USA. peter.kaufman@uvmhealth.org.
Cancer Treatment Centers of America · USEisai (United States) · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to estimate the overall survival (OS) in real-world clinical practice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and visceral metastases (liver or lung) treated in the third-line setting with eribulin, gemcitabine or capecitabine overall and in the major clinical categories of MBC (TNBC, HR+/HER2-, and HER2+).

methodsA retrospective, observational study was conducted with de-identified patient electronic health records from the Cancer Treatment Centers of America (CTCA). Patients with a diagnosis of metastatic breast with lung or liver metastases, and treated with eribulin, gemcitabine, or capecitabine as third-line therapy were included in the analysis. Landmark survival was calculated as percentage of patients alive at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Overall survival was compared between treatment arms within TNBC and HR+/HER2- using log-rank analysis. Cox regression analyses was performed to estimate hazard ratios for comparison of treatments within TNBC and HR+/HER2- subtype.

results443 patients with liver or lung metastases received third-line therapy with eribulin (n = 229), gemcitabine (n = 134), or capecitabine (n = 80). Eribulin patients had a higher percentage of patients alive at all landmark timepoints vs. gemcitabine, and a higher percentage of patients alive until 36 months vs. capecitabine. Median survival times showed that overall, and within the TNBC and HR+/HER2- subtype, patients receiving eribulin had a numerically higher median overall survival.

conclusionsThis real-world evidence study is consistent with randomized clinical trial data and demonstrates consistency of eribulin effectiveness in MBC patients with lung or liver metastases overall and in TNBC and HR+/HER2- disease.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsCapecitabineDeoxycytidineFemaleFuransGemcitabineHumansKetonesLiverPolyether PolyketidesRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisCapecitabineDeoxycytidineeribulinFuransGemcitabineKetonesPolyether PolyketidesEribulinMetastatic breast cancerOverall survivalReal-world evidenceVisceral metastases

Identifiers

PMID32808239
PMCPMC7599186
OpenAlexW3068005188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.