Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32808078›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021

Tumour blood flow for prediction of human prostate cancer aggressiveness: a study with Rubidium-82 PET, MRI and Na

Mads Ryø Jochumsen, Jens Sörensen, Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen, Jens Randel Nyengaard, Søren Rasmus Palmelund Krag, Jørgen Frøkiær, Michael Borre, Kirsten Bouchelouche, Lars Poulsen Tolbod

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Disrupting NaCancer & metabolism · 2024
    Article
  6. Extracardiac findings with increased perfusion during clinical O-15-HJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. DCE-MRI of Brain Fluid Barriers:Tissue barriers · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mads Ryø JochumsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. madsjoch@rm.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-7676-2322
Jens SörensenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bodil Ginnerup PedersenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jens Randel NyengaardDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Søren Rasmus Palmelund KragDepartment of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jørgen FrøkiærDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Michael BorreDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kirsten BoucheloucheDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lars Poulsen TolbodDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

Aage og Johanne Louis-Hansens Fond 18-2B-2007Aase og Ejnar Danielsens Fond 10-002143Agnes og Poul Friis Fond 81008-001Fabrikant Einar Willumsens Mindelegat 500028Harboefonden 17342Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region A1449Knud og Edith Eriksens Mindefond 62786Kræftens Bekæmpelse R79-A5204P. Carl Petersens Mindefond 18072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTumour blood flow (TBF) is a crucial determinant of cancer growth. Recently, we validated Rubidium-82 (

methodsOne hundred and two patients were included for pelvic

resultsTBF was the superior predictor (rho = 0.68, p < 0.0001, inflammatory lesions excluded) of MRI-guided biopsy grade group (GG) over lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value (rho = -0.23, p = 0.01), independent of ADC value and tumour volume (p < 0.0001). PET could separate GG-2-5 from GG-1 and benign lesions with an area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of 0.79, 96%, and 59%, respectively. For separating GG-3-5 from GG-1-2 and benign lesions the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.82, 95%, and 63%, respectively. Na

conclusionTBF is an independent predictor of PCa aggressiveness and deserves more attention, as it may be valuable in separating clinically significant from insignificant PCa.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphatasesProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePositron-Emission TomographyRubidium RadioisotopesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdenosine TriphosphatasesRubidium-82Rubidium RadioisotopesISUP grade groupNa+/K+-ATPaseProstate cancerRubidium-82Tumour blood flow

Identifiers

PMID32808078
PMCPMC7835182
OpenAlexW3063881473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.