Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32807911›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2020

Pediatric contact allergens in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Jodie Raffi, Nicole Kittler, Kathryn Schwarzenberger, Ilona Frieden, Nina Botto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jodie RaffiDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nicole KittlerDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kathryn SchwarzenbergerDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Ilona FriedenDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nina BottoDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. nina.botto@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5408-7346

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe degree of neonatal exposure to potentially sensitizing agents on neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and the process by which personal care products are selected for use in the NICU are poorly documented. STUDY

designWe evaluated personal care products used in three NICUs for potentially sensitizing agents. We interviewed NICU staff to analyze how products are selected and approved for use.

resultsTwenty-four personal care products were evaluated. 75% contained one or more potential contact allergen, with fragrances being most common. Staff preference, brand loyalty, cost, and small product size were often considered when approving NICU products.

conclusionsThe prevalence of potentially sensitizing agents in the products indicates a need for improvement in the evaluation and acquisition process of over-the-counter products used for neonatal skin care. The involvement of dermatology in this process may be beneficial.

Indexed as

AllergensIntensive Care Units, NeonatalChildHumansInfant, NewbornAllergens

Identifiers

PMID32807911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.