Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32807909›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2020

Creating CRISPR-responsive smart materials for diagnostics and programmable cargo release.

Raphael V Gayet, Helena de Puig, Max A English, Luis R Soenksen, Peter Q Nguyen, Angelo S Mao, Nicolaas M Angenent-Mari, James J Collins

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Autonomous Implants.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raphael V Gayet *Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6857-5941
Helena de Puig *Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Max A English *Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Luis R Soenksen *Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Peter Q NguyenWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0935-6404
Angelo S MaoInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Nicolaas M Angenent-MariDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
James J CollinsDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. jimjc@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5560-8246
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USBroad Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Materials that sense and respond to biological signals in their environment have a broad range of potential applications in drug delivery, medical devices and diagnostics. Nucleic acids are important biological cues that encode information about organismal identity and clinically relevant phenotypes such as drug resistance. We recently developed a strategy to design nucleic acid-responsive materials using the CRISPR-associated nuclease Cas12a as a user-programmable sensor and material actuator. This approach improves on the sensitivity of current DNA-responsive materials while enabling their rapid repurposing toward new sequence targets. Here, we provide a comprehensive resource for the design, synthesis and actuation of CRISPR-responsive hydrogels. First, we provide guidelines for the synthesis of Cas12a guide RNAs (gRNAs) for in vitro applications. We then outline methods for the synthesis of both polyethylene glycol-DNA (PEG-DNA) and polyacrylamide-DNA (PA-DNA) hydrogels, as well as their controlled degradation using Cas12a for the release of cargos, including small molecules, enzymes, nanoparticles and living cells within hours. Finally, we detail the design and assembly of microfluidic paper-based devices that use Cas12a-sensitive hydrogels to convert DNA inputs into a variety of visual and electronic readouts for use in diagnostics. Following the initial validation of the gRNA and Cas12a components (1 d), the synthesis and testing of either PEG-DNA or PA-DNA hydrogels require 3-4 d of laboratory time. Optional extensions, including the release of primary human cells or the design of the paper-based diagnostic, require an additional 2-3 d each.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDrug LiberationAcrylic ResinsBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDNADrug Delivery SystemsEndodeoxyribonucleasesHumansK562 CellsPolyacrylamidesPolyethylene GlycolsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsSmart MaterialsAcrylic ResinsBacterial ProteinsCas12a proteinCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDNAEndodeoxyribonucleasesPolyacrylamidesPolyethylene GlycolsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsSmart Materials

Identifiers

PMID32807909
OpenAlexW3049443028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.