SynthesisEye (London, England)2021
Effects of ultraviolet and blue-light filtering on sleep: a meta-analysis of controlled trials and studies on cataract patients.
Synthesis in Eye (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative assessment of sleep quality in glaucoma and cataract patients: the need for developing appropriate treatment methods for chronodisruption.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Blue Light Filtration in Intraocular Lenses: Effects on Visual Function and Systemic Health.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Review
- The Blue Light Hazard Versus Blue Light Hype.American journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- A review of the current state of research on artificial blue light safety as it applies to digital devices.Heliyon · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTwo types of intraocular lenses (IOLs), namely ultraviolet-filtering IOL (UVF-IOL) and blue-light-filtering IOL (BF-IOL), are used to replace the aging lens in cataract patients. This provides a clinical scenario to investigate the BF and UVF effects on circadian rhythm. We revisited this topic and conducted an updated meta-analysis investigating the effects of UVF-IOL and BF-IOL on sleep quality.
methodsA literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, and finally, four randomized controlled trials, one nonrandomized controlled study, and two cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis.
resultsThe fixed-effect model revealed a significantly larger sleep quality improvement in the UVF-IOL group than in the BF-IOL group (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.00-0.21) at 3-8 weeks but not 7-12 months after IOL implantation (SMD = 0.03, 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.13). The random effects model revealed no difference between groups at 3-8 weeks (SMD = 0.16, 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.39) and 7-12 months (SMD = 0.03, 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.13) after IOL implantation.
conclusionsOur study found some weak evidence supporting that UVF-IOL implantation demonstrated a greater improvement in subjective sleep quality than the BF-IOL implantation only in a shorter period but not in a longer period. More trials should be conducted before further recommendations. Nevertheless, our study provides some insights into the effects of short wavelength electromagnetic radiation on the circadian rhythm. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019128832.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.