Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32807385›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2020

Risk Differences in Secondary Prevention Patients Who Present With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Implications of Guideline-Directed Cholesterol Management.

Nathan W Kong, Aakash Bavishi, Ansel Philip Amaral, Anjan Tibrewala, Arif Jivan, Philip Silberman, Neil J Stone

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan W KongDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: nathan.kong@uchospitals.edu.
Aakash BavishiBluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Ansel Philip AmaralBluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Anjan TibrewalaBluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Arif JivanBluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Philip SilbermanClinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Neil J StoneBluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Northwestern University Molecular and Translational Cardiovascular Training ProgramT32HL134633 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MCNALLY, ELIZABETH M · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL134633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines for secondary prevention identified a group of "very high risk" (VHR) patients, those with multiple major atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events or 1 major ASCVD event with multiple high-risk features. A second group, "high risk" (HR), was defined as patients without any of the risk features in the VHR group. The incidence and relative risk differences of these 2 groups in a nontrial population has not been well characterized. Using the Northwestern Medicine Enterprise Data Warehouse, we compared the incidence of VHR and HR patients as well as their relative risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a single-center, large, academic, retrospective cohort study. Total 1,483 patients with acute coronary events from January 2014 to December 2016 were risk stratified into VHR and HR groups. International Classification of Diseases versions 9 and 10 were used to assess for composite events of unstable angina pectoris, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, or ST-elevation myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or all-cause death with a median follow-up of 3.3 years. VHR patients were found to have 87 ± 5.4 composite events per 1,000 patient-years compared with HR patients who had 33 ± 5.1 events per 1,000 patient-years (p <0.001). VHR group had increased risk of future events as compared to the HR group (multivariable adjusted hazard ratio 1.66 [1.01 to 2.74], p = 0.047). In conclusion, these results support the stratification of patients into the VHR and HR risk groups for secondary prevention.

Indexed as

Secondary PreventionAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedFemaleHumansHypercholesterolemiaMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32807385
PMCPMC8130011
OpenAlexW3044040713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.