Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32807239›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2020

Prevalence of fosfomycin resistance and gene mutations in clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Yi-Chien Lee, Pao-Yu Chen, Jann-Tay Wang, Shan-Chwen Chang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Global prevalence of macrolide-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Detection ofVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The Controversial Effect of Antibiotics on Methicillin-SensitiveInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. CaninePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi-Chien LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Pao-Yu ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, 100, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jann-Tay WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, 100, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shan-Chwen ChangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, 100, Taipei, Taiwan. changsc@ntu.edu.tw.
National Taiwan University Hospital · TWFu Jen Catholic University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFosfomycin exhibits excellent in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Increasing fosfomycin resistance among clinical MRSA isolates was reported previously, but little is known about the relative abundance of Fosfomycin resistance genes in MRSA isolates circulating in Taiwan.

methodsAll MRSA isolates, collected in 2002 and 2012 by the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) program, were used in this study. Susceptibility to various antimicrobial agents, including fosfomycin, was determined by broth microdilution. Genetic determinants of fosfomycin resistance, including fosB carriage and murA, glpT and uhpT mutations, were investigated using PCR and sequencing of amplicons. Staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing was also performed to determine the genetic relatedness of MRSA isolates.

resultsA total of 969 MRSA strains, 495 in the year 2002 and 474 in the year 2012, were analyzed. The overall in vitro susceptibility was 8.2% to erythromycin, 18.0% to clindamycin, 29.0% to tetracycline, 44.6% to ciprofloxacin, 57.5% to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 86.9% to rifampicin, 92.9% to fosfomycin and 100% to linezolid and vancomycin. A significant increase in the fosfomycin resistance rate was observed from 3.4% in 2002 to 11.0% in 2012. Of 68 fosfomycin-resistant MRSA isolates, several genetic backgrounds probably contributing to fosfomycin resistance were identified. Twelve isolates harbored the fosB gene, and various mutations in murA, uhpT, and glpT genes were noted in 11, 59, and 66 isolates, respectively. The most prevalent gene mutations were found in the combination of uhpT and glpT genes (58 isolates). The vast majority of the fosfomycin-resistant MRSA isolates belonged to spa type t002.

conclusionsAn increased fosfomycin resistance rate of MRSA isolates was observed in our present study, mostly due to mutations in the glpT and uhpT genes. Clonal spread probably contributed to the increased fosfomycin resistance.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCross InfectionDrug Resistance, BacterialFosfomycinHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationPrevalenceStaphylococcal InfectionsTaiwanAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsFosfomycinFosfomycinGene mutationsMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusResistance

Identifiers

PMID32807239
PMCPMC7430020
OpenAlexW3049486205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.