Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32807205›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2020

Methods for copy number aberration detection from single-cell DNA-sequencing data.

Xian F Mallory, Mohammadamin Edrisi, Nicholas Navin, Luay Nakhleh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xian F MalloryDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Mohammadamin EdrisiDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.
Nicholas NavinDepartment of Genetics, the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Luay NakhlehDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA. nakhleh@rice.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copy number aberrations (CNAs), which are pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs), play an important role in the initiation and progression of cancer. Single-cell DNA-sequencing (scDNAseq) technologies produce data that is ideal for inferring CNAs. In this review, we review eight methods that have been developed for detecting CNAs in scDNAseq data, and categorize them according to the steps of a seven-step pipeline that they employ. Furthermore, we review models and methods for evolutionary analyses of CNAs from scDNAseq data and highlight advances and future research directions for computational methods for CNA detection from scDNAseq data.

Indexed as

Base SequenceDNA Copy Number VariationsChromosome AberrationsComputational BiologyDNAHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansNeoplasmsSequence Analysis, DNADNACopy number aberrationsIntra-tumor heterogeneitySingle-cell DNA sequencingTumor evolution

Identifiers

PMID32807205
PMCPMC7433197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.