Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32807156›Full record

ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2020

Not there yet: using data-driven methods to predict who becomes costly among low-cost patients with type 2 diabetes.

Julie C Lauffenburger, Mufaddal Mahesri, Niteesh K Choudhry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julie C LauffenburgerCenter for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont Street, Suite 3030, Boston, MA, 02120, USA. jlauffenburger@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4940-4140
Mufaddal MahesriCenter for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont Street, Suite 3030, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
Niteesh K ChoudhryCenter for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont Street, Suite 3030, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.

Funding

The Roybal Center for TherapeuticOptimization using BehavioralScienceP30AG064199 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Niteesh K Choudhry · 2019 to 2026
$8.3M
Development of a novel medication adherability tool to improve cardiovascular disease managementK01HL141538 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LAUFFENBURGER, JULIE CHRISTINE · 2018 to 2022
$718k
National Institute for Health Care Management Foundation N/ANHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL141538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes is a leading cause of Medicare spending; predicting which individuals are likely to be costly is essential for targeting interventions. Current approaches generally focus on composite measures, short time-horizons, or patients who are already high utilizers, whose costs may be harder to modify. Thus, we used data-driven methods to classify unique clusters in Medicare claims who were initially low utilizers by their diabetes spending patterns in subsequent years and used machine learning to predict these patterns.

methodsWe identified beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes whose spending was in the bottom 90% of diabetes care spending in a one-year baseline period in Medicare fee-for-service data. We used group-based trajectory modeling to classify unique clusters of patients by diabetes-related spending patterns over a two-year follow-up. Prediction models were estimated with generalized boosted regression, a machine learning method, using sets of all baseline predictors, diabetes predictors, and predictors that are potentially-modifiable through interventions. Each model was evaluated through C-statistics and 5-fold cross-validation.

resultsAmong 33,789 beneficiaries (baseline median diabetes spending: $4153), we identified 5 distinct spending patterns that could largely be predicted; of these, 68.1% of patients had consistent spending, 25.3% had spending that rose quickly, and 6.6% of patients had spending that rose progressively. The ability to predict these groups was moderate (validated C-statistics: 0.63 to 0.87). The most influential factors for those with progressively rising spending were age, generosity of coverage, prior spending, and medication adherence.

conclusionsPatients with type 2 diabetes who were initially low spenders exhibit distinct subsequent long-term patterns of diabetes spending; membership in these patterns can be largely predicted with data-driven methods. These findings as well as applications of the overall approach could potentially inform the design and timing of diabetes or cost-containment interventions, such as medication adherence or interventions that enhance access to care, among patients with type 2 diabetes.

Indexed as

Diabetes ComplicationsHealth Care CostsAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityCost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Disease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncomeMaleMedicarePrognosisSocioeconomic FactorsCosts of care/healthcare expendituresDiabetesHealthcare managementMedicare

Identifiers

PMID32807156
PMCPMC7433196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.