Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32807149›Full record

Observational studyBMC pulmonary medicine2020

Home mechanical ventilation: quality of life patterns after six months of treatment.

Luca Valko, Szabolcs Baglyas, V Anna Gyarmathy, Janos Gal, Andras Lorx

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Trisomy 13, home health-care and multidisciplinary approach: Case report.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2024
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. OSA and Chronic Respiratory Disease: Mechanisms and Epidemiology.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Luca ValkoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, Ulloi ut 78/B, Budapest, 1082, Hungary. valko.luca@med.semmelweis-univ.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4046-4681
Szabolcs BaglyasDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, Ulloi ut 78/B, Budapest, 1082, Hungary.
V Anna GyarmathyEpiConsult, Dover, DE, USA.
Janos GalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, Ulloi ut 78/B, Budapest, 1082, Hungary.
Andras LorxDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, Ulloi ut 78/B, Budapest, 1082, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HUJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt has been shown that home mechanical ventilation improves quality of life, but it has not been widely studied which particular patient groups benefit the most from starting this type of therapy. The purpose of this prospective observational study was to evaluate quality of life change patterns 6 months after initiation of home mechanical ventilation in patients suffering from chronic respiratory failure using patient reported outcomes.

methodsWe enrolled 74 chronic respiratory failure patients starting invasive or noninvasive home mechanical ventilation through the Semmelweis University Home Mechanical Ventilation Program. Quality of life was evaluated at baseline and at 6 months after initiation of home mechanical ventilation using the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire.

resultsOverall quality of life showed 10.5% improvement 6 months after initiation of home mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001). The greatest improvement was observed in Respiratory complaint (20.4%, p = 0.015), Sleep and attendant symptoms (19.3%, p < 0.001), and Anxiety related subscales (14.4%, p < 0.001). Interface (invasive versus noninvasive ventilation) was not associated with improvement in quality of life (p = 0.660). Severely impaired patients showed the greatest improvement (CC = -0.328, p < 0.001). Initial diagnosis contributed to the observed change (p = 0.025), with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obesity hypoventilation syndrome patients showing the greatest improvement, while amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients showed no improvement in quality of life. We found that patients who were started on long term ventilation in an acute setting, required oxygen supplementation and had low baseline quality of life, showed the most improvement during the six-month study period.

conclusionsOur study highlights the profound effect of home mechanical ventilation on quality of life in chronic respiratory failure patients that is indifferent of ventilation interface but is dependent on initial diagnosis and some baseline characteristics, like acute initiation, oxygen supplementation need and baseline quality of life.

trial registrationThis study was approved by and registered at the ethics committee of Semmelweis University (SE TUKEB 251/2017; 20th of December, 2017).

Indexed as

Home Care Services, Hospital-BasedAdultAgedAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisFemaleHumansHungaryMaleMiddle AgedObesity Hypoventilation SyndromeProspective StudiesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Function TestsRespiratory InsufficiencyChronic respiratory failureDomiciliary ventilationHome mechanical ventilationLong term ventilationQuality of life change

Identifiers

PMID32807149
PMCPMC7433042
OpenAlexW3049114601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.