Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32807137›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Variations in outcomes for women admitted to hospital in early versus active labour: an observational study.

Yvette D Miller, Ashleigh A Armanasco, Laura McCosker, Rachel Thompson

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yvette D MillerQueensland University of Technology, Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, School of Public Health & Social Work, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia. yvette.miller@qut.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5393-7142
Ashleigh A ArmanascoQueensland University of Technology, Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, School of Public Health & Social Work, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia.
Laura McCoskerQueensland University of Technology, Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, School of Public Health & Social Work, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia.
Rachel ThompsonSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

AusHSI Stimulus Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no available evidence for the prevalence of early labour admission to hospital or its association with rates of intervention and clinical outcomes in Australia. The objectives of this study were to: estimate the prevalence of early labour admission in one hospital in Australia; compare rates of clinical intervention, length of hospital stay and clinical outcomes for women admitted in early (< 4 cm cervical dilatation) or active (≥4 cm) labour; and determine the impact of recent recommendations to define early labour as < 5 cm on the findings.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using medical record data from a random sample of 1223 women from live singleton births recorded between July 2013 and December 2015. Analyses included women who had spontaneous onset of labour at ≥37 weeks gestation whilst not a hospital inpatient, who had not scheduled a caesarean section before labour onset or delivered prior to hospital admission. Associations between timing of hospital admission in labour and clinical intervention, outcomes and hospital stay were assessed using logistic regression.

resultsBetween 32.4% (< 4 cm) and 52.9% (< 5 cm) of eligible women (N = 697) were admitted to hospital in early labour. After adjustment for potential confounders, women admitted in early labour (< 4 cm) were more likely to have their labour augmented by oxytocin (AOR = 3.57, 95% CI 2.39-5.34), an epidural (AOR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.51-3.41), a caesarean birth (AOR = 3.50, 95% CI 2.10-5.83), more vaginal examinations (AOR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.53-1.95), and their baby admitted to special care nursery (AOR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.01-2.35). Defining early labour as < 5 cm cervical dilatation produced additional significant associations with artificial rupture of membranes (AOR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.02-1.95), assisted vaginal birth (AOR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.12-3.41) neonatal resuscitation (AOR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.01-2.99) and longer maternal hospital stay (AOR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.04-1.40).

conclusionsFindings provide preliminary evidence that a notable proportion of labouring women are admitted in early labour and are more likely to experience several medical procedures, neonatal resuscitation and admission to special care nursery, and longer hospital stay.

Indexed as

HospitalizationLabor, ObstetricAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLabor Stage, FirstPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultActive phaseBirthHospital admissionLabour managementLatent phaseMedical intervention

Identifiers

PMID32807137
PMCPMC7430117
OpenAlexW3049498480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.