ArticleGenes2020
Evaluation of the Ion AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 Research Panel by Massive Parallel Sequencing.
Article in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Transcriptomic characterization of maturing neurons from human neural stem cells across developmental time points.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Article
- Reflective Evaluation of Next-Generation Sequencing Data during Early Phase Detection of the Delta Variant.OBM genetics · 2025Article
- Alternative genome sequencing approaches of SARS-CoV-2 using Ion AmpliSeq Technology.MethodsX · 2024Article
- Targeted Sequencing Approach and Its Clinical Applications for the Molecular Diagnosis of Human Diseases.Cells · 2023Review
- SARS-CoV-2 multi-variant rapid detector based on graphene transistor functionalized with an engineered dimeric ACE2 receptor.Nano today · 2023Article
- Monitoring and tracking the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Asturias, Spain.Access microbiology · 2023Article
- Multiplexed Target Enrichment Enables Efficient and In-Depth Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistome in Metagenomes.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- De novo emergence of the mutation E484K in a SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 lineage variant.Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.) · 2022Article
- Article
- Repurposing Positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test Devices for Variant Tracking.Current microbiology · 2022Article
- HIV-1 Drug Resistance Assay Using Ion Torrent Next Generation Sequencing and On-Instrument End-to-End Analysis Software.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Novel RT-ddPCR assays for measuring the levels of subgenomic and genomic SARS-CoV-2 transcripts.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2022Article
- Clinical and Infection Prevention Applications of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Genotyping: An Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Society for Microbiology Consensus Review Document.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022Review
- Use of the Ct difference between the Nucleocapside (N) and the Spike (S) or RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) genes as a preliminary screening for SARS-CoV-2 variants with the Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2/FluA/FluB/RSV Assay: Searching the N in Variants.Journal of virological methods · 2022Article
- Clinical and Infection Prevention Applications of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Genotyping: an Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Society for Microbiology Consensus Review Document.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022Review
- Article
- Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequencing: Quality Criteria and Low-Frequency Variants.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep knowledge of the genetic features of SARS-CoV-2 is essential to track the ongoing pandemic through different geographical areas and to design and develop early diagnostic procedures, therapeutic strategies, public health interventions, and vaccines. We describe protocols and first results of the Ion AmpliSeq™ SARS-CoV-2 Research Panel by a massively parallel sequencing (MPS) assay. The panel allows for targeted sequencing by overlapping amplicons, thereby providing specific, accurate, and high throughput analysis. A modified reverse transcription reaction, which consists of the use of a SARS-CoV-2 specific primers pool from the Ion AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 Research Panel, was assessed in order to promote viral RNA specific reverse transcription. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Ion AmpliSeq™ SARS-CoV-2 Research Panel in sequencing the entire viral genome in different samples. SARS-CoV-2 sequence data were obtained from ten viral isolates and one nasopharyngeal swab from different patients. The ten isolate samples amplified with 12 PCR cycles displayed high mean depth values compared to those of the two isolates amplified with 20 PCR cycles. High mean depth values were also obtained for the nasopharyngeal swab processed by use of a target-specific reverse transcription. The relative depth of coverage (rDoC) analysis showed that when 12 PCR cycles were used, all target regions were amplified with high sequencing coverage, while in libraries amplified at 20 cycles, a poor uniformity of amplification, with absent or low coverage of many target regions, was observed. Our results show that the Ion AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 Research Panel can achieve rapid and high throughput SARS-CoV-2 whole genome sequencing from 10 ng of DNA-free viral RNA from isolates and from 1 ng of DNA-free viral RNA from a nasopharyngeal swab using 12 PCR cycles for library amplification. The modified RT-PCR protocol yielded superior results on the nasopharyngeal swab compared to the reverse transcription reaction set up according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.