Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32806743›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

The Social Determinants of Health: Time to Re-Think?

John Frank, Thomas Abel, Stefano Campostrini, Sarah Cook, Vivian K Lin, David V McQueen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The bio-psycho-social determinants of health: Reflections on the CIAR Population Health Program (1987-2003).Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Then, Now, Next: Unpacking the Shifting Trajectory of Social Determinants of Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Population health management fit lifecycles in analytics.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John FrankDirector of Knowledge Exchange and Research Impact, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Room 1-308, Doorway #1, Teviot Hall, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3912-4214
Thomas AbelISPM, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6740-1149
Stefano CampostriniDepartment of Economics, University Ca' Foscari Venice, 30121 Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7113-4458
Sarah CookDirector, Institute for Global Development, University of New South Wales, John Goodsell Building, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2308-3967
Vivian K LinExecutive Associate Dean, Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
David V McQueenISPM, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twelve years have now passed since the influential WHO Report on the Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) in 2008. A group of senior international public health scholars and decision-makers met in Italy in mid-2019 to review the legacy of the SDoH conceptual framework and its adequacy for the many challenges facing our field as we enter the 2020s. Four major categories of challenges were identified: emerging "exogenous" challenges to global health equity, challenges related to weak policy and practice implementation, more fundamental challenges related to SDoH theory and research, and broader issues around modern research in general. Each of these categories is discussed, and potential solutions offered. We conclude that although the SDoH framework is still a worthy core platform for public health research, policy, and practice, the time is ripe for significant evolution.

Indexed as

Health EquitySocial Determinants of HealthHealth PolicyItalyPublic Healthhealth policyhealth promotionsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID32806743
PMCPMC7459980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.