Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32806610›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Advanced Sandwich Composite Cores for Patient Support in Advanced Clinical Imaging and Oncology Treatment.

Robert H Morris, Nicasio R Geraldi, Lucy C Pike, Jörg Pawelke, Aswin L Hoffmann, Nicola Doy, Johanna L Stafford, Abi Spicer, Michael I Newton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Robert H MorrisSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.
Nicasio R GeraldiSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7564-7568
Lucy C PikeKing's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4381-3349
Jörg PawelkeOncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4128-5498
Aswin L HoffmannOncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Nicola DoySchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.
Johanna L StaffordSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.
Abi SpicerSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.
Michael I NewtonSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4231-1002

Funding

Department of Health RP-2016-07-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ongoing advances in both imaging and treatment for oncology purposes have seen a significant rise in the use of not only the individual imaging modalities, but also their combination in single systems such as Positron Emission Tomography combined with Computed Tomography (PET-CT) and PET-MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) when planning for advanced oncology treatment, the most demanding of which is proton therapy. This has identified issues in the availability of suitable materials upon which to support the patient undergoing imaging and treatment owing to the differing requirements for each of the techniques. Sandwich composites are often selected to solve this issue but there is little information regarding optimum materials for their cores. In this paper, we presented a range of materials which are suitable for such purposes and evaluated the performance for use in terms of PET signal attenuation, proton beam stopping, MRI signal shading and X-Ray CT visibility. We found that Extruded Polystyrene offers the best compromise for patient support and positioning structures across all modalities tested, allowing for significant savings in treatment planning time and delivering more efficient treatment with lower margins.

Indexed as

clinical imagingcompositecoreCTMRIPETproton

Identifiers

PMID32806610
PMCPMC7475909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.